Technology-based interventions for substance use treatment among people who identify as African American/Black, Hispanic/Latina/o, and American Indian/Alaskan Native: A scoping review (Preprint)

Author:

Moore Sarah K.ORCID,Boggis Jesse S.,Gauthier Phoebe R.,Lambert-Harris Chantal A.,Hichborn Emily G.,Bell Kathleen D.,Saunders Elizabeth C.,Montgomery LaTrice,Murphy Eilis I.,Turner Avery M.,Agosti Nico,McLeman Bethany M.ORCID,Marsch Lisa A.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the United States, racial and ethnic disparities in substance use treatment outcomes are persistent, especially among African American/Black (AA/B), Hispanic/Latina/o (H/L), and American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) populations. Technology-based interventions (TBIs) for substance use treatment show promise in reducing barriers to evidence-based treatment, yet no studies have described how TBIs may impact racial and/or ethnic health equity.

OBJECTIVE

This study explores whether TBIs in substance use treatment research promote health equity among people who identify as AA/B, H/L, and AI/AN through inclusion in research. Further, we explore whether research that does include the above groups consciously considers race and/or ethnicity beyond including these populations as participants.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycInfo) to identify TBIs in substance use treatment studies published in English between January 2000 to March 2021. Studies were included if at least 50% of participants identified as AA/B, H/L, and/or AI/AN when combined. Included studies were evaluated for conscious consideration of race and ethnicity in at least one manuscript section (e.g., methods). Last, we conducted a critical appraisal of each study’s potential to facilitate insights into the impact of a TBI for members of specific URM groups.

RESULTS

Of 6,897 titles/abstracts screened and 1,158 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, nearly half of the full-text articles were excluded due to the absence of data reported on race and or ethnicity, or not meeting demographic eligibility criteria referenced above. One hundred and ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Study designs included 43 randomized trials, 39 feasibility, 8 development, and 7 secondary analyses. Fifty-two (48%) studies utilized computer-based interventions, including electronic screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment while 37 (34%) utilized interactive voice response, ecological momentary assessment/intervention, or text messaging intervention via mobile phones. Studies focused on the following substances: alcohol or drug use (n=45:41%), alcohol alone (n=26:24%), opioids (n=8:7%), cannabis (n=6:5%), cocaine (n=4:4%) and methamphetamine (n=3:3%). Twenty-nine studies (26%) consciously considered race and/or ethnicity, with 7 studies (6%) explicitly considering race and/or ethnicity in all manuscript sections. Thirty-one studies (28%) were critically appraised with higher confidence in the interpretability of findings for specific URM groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While the prevalence of TBIs in substance use treatment has increased in recent years, studies that include and consciously consider underrepresented minorities are rare, especially for AI/AN and H/L groups. This review highlights the limited research on TBIs in substance use treatment which promote racial and ethnic health equity, and provides context, insights, and direction for researchers working to develop and evaluate digital technology substance use interventions while promoting health equity.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3