Are Patient Decision Aids Effective in Decreasing Antibiotic Prescription for Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections During General Practice and Emergency Department Encounters: A Systematic Review Protocol (Preprint)

Author:

Ramasamy ShivaORCID,Gilani Ali,Alshurafa Mohamad,Phillip Leesa,De Silva Janath

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

ABSTRACT Background Antibiotic resistance is a global issue that has a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. Evidence exists within the general practice and the emergency department setting to suggest that antimicrobial overuse is a significant contributor to resistance. Upper respiratory tract infections are a group of conditions for which antibiotics may be inappropriately prescribed. Patient decision aids are tools allowing for shared decision making between clinician and patient, incorporating patient values and the latest evidence into the decision of whether to prescribe antibiotics or not. Objectives To determine if patient decision aids are effective in decreasing antibiotic prescription for acute upper respiratory tract infections during general practice and emergency department encounters, and to comment on the depth of literature available in this field. Methods and Analysis We have established a protocol for a systematic review to assess the efficacy of patient decision aids in reducing antibiotic prescription for upper respiratory tract infections in general practices and emergency departments. A set of inclusion criteria has been established. We will include systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials only. A search strategy was formed and will be used in the Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect and Cochrane databases as well as sources of unpublished literature. Primary and secondary outcomes will focus on immediate and longer-term antibiotic prescription rate and patient decision aid efficacy. We have established a literature screening process and criteria for quantitative synthesis. Literature screening and study quality assessment will be carried out by two independent and blinded reviewers. We will use a single data extraction protocol. Results We are yet to start any formal data collection or analysis but have secured funding from Mackay Institute of Research and Innovation. Ethics and Dissemination It was decided that this systematic review protocol did not require ethical approval. Study sponsors will be communicated with regularly regarding the study, which will be published in a journal in the relevant field. Any updates to the protocol will be published as required. Registration Prospero registration number: CRD42017069598 Keywords Patient decision aid; Shared decision making; Upper respiratory tract infection; Antibiotic prescription; General practice; Emergency department

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3