Lessons learned from the evaluation of suicide.ca, the digital platform of Quebec's Digital Suicide Prevention Strategy (Preprint)

Author:

Côté Louis-PhilippeORCID,Lane JulieORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study illustrates, through the example of Quebec's Digital Suicide Prevention Strategy, how a single digital platform can be used to carry out universal, selective and indicated suicide prevention.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to document the use of the suicide.ca website, describe the profile of its users and estimate the impact of universal, selective and indicated prevention strategies deployed via the platform.

METHODS

Analyses were conducted using data collected via Google Analytics (number of sessions, sources of traffic acquisition, landing pages), questionnaires from the platform's self-assessment module (Mental health Continuum Short Form, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale – French Version, Patient Health Questionnaire, Mood Disorder Questionnaire, Social Phobia Inventory, DÉBA (Drug & Alcohol, Internet Use, Gambling), PTSD Checklist for DSM-5), the intervention service triage questionnaire (age, gender, Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale – French Version), intervention reports completed by counselors, and post-intervention questionnaires completed by users.

RESULTS

127,495 visits were made to suicide.ca from October 15, 2020 to October 17, 2021. Only 40% of users started their visit on the home page, Ad-words campaigns accounted for 24.42% of traffic acquisition on the platform and 40% of visits from search engines, excluding AdWords ads, began with a fact sheet on a suicide risk factor. The platform's social media promotion was associated with traffic peaks. The proportion of users with severe suicidal ideation on the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale – French Version was 33.2% for the self-assessment module and 75% for the intervention service. Although the self-assessment users presented less severe suicidal ideations than the intervention service users, 87.8% of them obtained a Kessler-10 score indicating the probable presence of a mental health problem. Question about suicidality in the triage resulted in few dropouts. 33.8% of the intervention service users were considered by the counselors at high foreseeable risk for a suicide attempt in the near future and 5.8% were in imminent danger of a suicide attempt. Counselors reported that the user felt better after the intervention in 56% of contacts. As for self-management tools, between 23% and 58% of users who downloaded the mobile application did not create a user account.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a wide range of sources for acquiring traffic to the platform. AdWords campaigns and fact sheets on suicide risk factors are important sources of traffic acquisition on the platform. The platform reaches people with varying degrees of suicidal risk. The user account was a barrier to the use of mental health self-management tools. Counselors generally feel that their interventions have a positive impact. Intervention service users are generally satisfied with the service they received.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3