Effectiveness of digitally delivered lifestyle interventions on depression, anxiety, stress and wellbeing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Preprint)

Author:

Brinsley JacintaORCID,O'Connor Edward JORCID,Singh BenORCID,McKeon GraceORCID,Curtis RachelORCID,Ferguson TyORCID,Gosse Georgia,Willems Iris,Marent Pieter-Jan,Szeto KimberleyORCID,Firth JosephORCID,Maher CarolORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of robust evidence to show that lifestyle behaviours influence mental health outcomes. Technology offers an accessible and cost-effective implementation method, yet the effectiveness of interventions to date has been specific to the mode of delivery, population or behaviour.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of all digitally delivered lifestyle interventions for improving symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and wellbeing.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO and Scopus was conducted to identify studies published between January 2013 and January 2023. Randomised controlled trials of digital lifestyle (physical activity, sleep, diet) interventions for adults that reported a validated measure of depression, anxiety, stress or wellbeing and were published in English were included. Data were independently extracted and appraised using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence by multiple authors. Inverse-variance random-effects meta-analyses were used for data analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted to determine whether results differed based on the target lifestyle behaviour, delivery method, digital features, design features or population characteristics. The main outcome was changes in symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and wellbeing measured by validated self-report of clinician administered outcomes from pre- to post-intervention.

RESULTS

Of 14357 studies identified, 61 studies were included. Digital lifestyle interventions had a significant small-to-medium effect on depression (SMD -0.37, p <0.001), a small effect on anxiety (SMD -0.29, p <0.001), and stress (SMD -0.17, p <0.05), and no effect on wellbeing (SMD 0.14, p =0.15). Subgroup analyses generally suggested that effects were similar regardless of the delivery method or features used, the duration and frequency of the intervention, the population, or the lifestyle behaviour targeted.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, these results indicate that delivering lifestyle interventions via a range of digital methods can have significant positive effects on depression, anxiety and stress for a broad range of populations, while effects on wellbeing are unclear.

CLINICALTRIAL

This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023428908).

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3