Exploring women’s experiences on an internet-delivered intervention to prevent depression and enhance subjective well-being during the perinatal period: A qualitative study (Preprint)

Author:

Valla LisbethORCID,Haga Silje MarieORCID,Niegel Susan GarthusORCID,Drozd FilipORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Background: The perinatal period is a vulnerable time where women are at increased risk of depression. “Mamma Mia” is a universal preventive internet intervention offered to pregnant women with the primary goals to prevent the onset or worsening of depression and enhance subjective well-being during the perinatal period. However, treatment dropout from internet-based interventions is often reported. The study aim was to acquire an understanding of different experiences among participants who dropped out of the Mamma Mia intervention during pregnancy, compared to the participants who dropped out during the postpartum and follow-up phase.

OBJECTIVE

The study aim was thus to acquire an understanding of different experiences among participants who dropped out of the intervention during pregnancy, compared to the participants who dropped out during the postpartum and follow-up phase.

METHODS

Methods: A total of 16 women from a larger randomized controlled trial (Mamma Mia) were interviewed with individual semi-structured interviews following a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats format. Of the 16 participants included, eight women dropped out early in the intervention during pregnancy (pregnancy group), while eight women dropped out later, after giving birth (postpartum and follow-up group). Data were analyzed using the framework approach.

RESULTS

Results: The results showed that there were differences between the groups. In general, more participants in the postpartum and follow-up group reported that the program was user-friendly. They became more aware of their own thoughts and feelings and perceived that the program had provided them with more new knowledge and practical information than the participants in the pregnancy group. Respondents in both groups suggested several opportunities for improving the program.

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions: There were differences between women who dropped out of the intervention during pregnancy and the postpartum and follow-up phase. The reported differences between groups should be further examined.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3