Human-Centered Design for Clinical Trial Improvement: A Step-by-Step Guide with an Off-Label Drug Case Study (Preprint)

Author:

Parsell Maren C.ORCID,Greenleaf Morgan N.ORCID,Kombara Greeshma G.,Sukhatme Vikas P.ORCID,Lam Wilbur A.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Utilizing a human-centered design (HCD) approach and methods can provide clinical trial design teams with a better understanding of the needs, preferences, and attitudes of clinical trial stakeholders. It can also be used to understand the challenges and barriers physician stakeholders face in initiating and completing clinical trials, especially for off label drugs (OLD) to treat unmet clinical needs in cancer treatment. However, the HCD approach and methods are not commonly taught in the context of clinical trial design and few step-by-step guides like this study are available to demonstrate its application.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and process of applying a human-centered design approach to creating clinical trial support resources for physician stakeholders to overcome barriers to pursing clinical trials for off label drugs to treat cancer.

METHODS

A human-centered design approach was used to develop OLD clinical trial support concepts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 physicians to identify barriers to prescribing OLDs for cancer treatments (outside of a clinical trial and absent national guidelines) and initiating cancer clinical trials for OLDs. Affinity mapping and thematic analysis of qualitative data gathered from the interviews informed further co-design exercises with 9 participants in 3 sessions. These in-person sessions included creative matrix exercises and concept voting to refine and prioritize the ideas that the design team used to produce 3 recommended concepts.

RESULTS

Findings demonstrate the potential of HCD methods to uncover important insights into barriers physicians face in prescribing OLDs and initiating and completing OLD clinical trials such as recruitment, financial disincentives, and stigma. Participants found the HCD approach engaging and 60% participated for the duration of the study despite their full clinical schedules. Over 150 ideas were generated in 3 co-design sessions, with the groups voting on 15 priority ideas which the design team then refined into 3 final recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Using participatory human-centered design methods, we delivered 3 concepts for clinical trial support resources to help physician stakeholders overcome barriers to pursing clinical trials for off label drugs to treat cancer. This paper highlights the process, methods, and potential of human-centered design to improve cancer clinical trial design. Future work is needed to train clinical trial designers in the HCD approach and methods, and to encourage adoption in the field.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3