Knowledge Mapping of Health Economics From 2012 to 2021: Visualization and Data-Driven Bibliometric Study (Preprint)

Author:

Xue XiaoranORCID,Pan YuxinORCID,Chen MingcongORCID,Cao BuziORCID,Zhao MingyiORCID,He QingnanORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health economics is a branch of economics that focuses on the health sector and related topics both theoretically and practically. Practical medical resources can be maximized through health economics. However, little research has been conducted for comprehensive assessments of publications on health economies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of health economics in the last decade to quantify the status and trend and aims to guide researchers to potential future research points of value from a global perspective.

METHODS

4163 scientific publications were collected from the Web of Science core collection, including the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Five scientometric tools (Citespacev6.1.R2, VOSviewer, Scimago Graphica, bibliometrix R-package, and Microsoft Excel 2019) were used to perform bibliometric analysis in terms of annual publications, the collaboration of authors, co-citation of authors, source, co-citation of journals, co-citation of references, and co-occurrence of keywords.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2022, 4163 publications in the field of health economies were published by 21,145 authors who come from 478 institutions in 136 countries/regions. The United States and the United Kingdom produced the most publications, of which the United States maintained the dominant position in health economies, and it is the best practitioner in terms of cooperation; meanwhile, Univ Oxford of Sciences is the most productive institution. Karolinska Inst and Kings Coll London had a high centrality. Schwendicke F published the most papers, while Petrou S, Drummond M, and Augustovski F had the most co-citations. BMJ Open was the top 1 co-cited journal. In the top 10 co-cited references, five co-citation references expand on cost-effectiveness analyses which can be seen as a hotspot. The top 20 keywords, including "care," "impact," and "health," combined with the keywords clustering approach, it is concluded that "quality of life," "impact," and "care" in the process of diseases as well as "public health economy and policy" are hot spots in the field of the health economy.

CONCLUSIONS

Health economics research has been growing steadily over the past decade, with 2018 being a pivotal year for acceleration. The research mainly focuses on the strategic research of policy-making and resource allocation in professional disciplines. Comprehensive methodological research publications are hugely influential and complement mathematics, statistics, and economics with each other. Cost-benefit analysis is an indispensable research tool. Health economics will be a productive and efficient subject in the future.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3