Perceived acceptability of apps for mental health assessment and triage with recommendations for future design: a UK semi-structured interview study (Preprint)

Author:

Funnell Erin LORCID,Spadaro BenedettaORCID,Martin-Key Nayra AORCID,Benacek JiriORCID,Bahn SabineORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mental health care provision in the UK is overwhelmed, with high demand for services. There are also high rates of under-, over-, and misdiagnosis of common mental health disorders in primary care and delays to accessing secondary care. This negatively impacts on patient functioning and outcomes. Digital tools may offer a time-efficient avenue for remote assessment and triage of mental health disorders which can be integrated directly into existing care pathways to support clinicians. However, despite the potential of digital tools for mental health there remain gaps in our understanding of how the intended userbase, people with lived experienced of mental health concerns, perceive these technologies.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perspectives and attitudes of individuals with lived experience of mental health concerns on mental health apps that are designed to support self-assessment and triage.

METHODS

A semi-structured interview approach was employed, exploring perspectives of interviewees using five open-ended questions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim from audio data recordings. The average interview lasted 46 minutes (rounded to the nearest minute; SD=12.93 minutes). Thematic analysis (TA) was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 16 individuals were interviewed in the current study. The average age was 42.25 (SD=15.18), half the interviewees were female (50%, n=8), and all were white (100%, n=16). TA revealed six major themes: (1) availability and accessibility, (2) quality, (3) attitudes, (4) safety, (5) impact and (6) functionality.

CONCLUSIONS

Engaging in clear communication regarding data security and privacy policies, adopting a consent-driven approach to data sharing, and identifying gaps in the app marketplace to foster inclusion of a range of mental health conditions and avoid oversaturation of apps for common mental health disorders (eg, depression and anxiety) were identified as priorities from interviewee comments. Additionally, reputation was identified as a driver to uptake and engagement, with endorsement from a respected source (ie, health care provider, academic institution) or direct recommendation from a trusted health care professional associated with increased interest and trust. Furthermore, there was interest in the role apps could play in existing care pathways, particularly in terms of utilizing a results report from a digital self-assessment in facilitating informed discussions with health care professionals during appointments, and by signposting individuals to the most appropriate services. Additionally, interviewees discussed the potential for mental health apps to provide waiting list support to individuals awaiting treatment by providing personalized psychoeducation, self-help tips, and sources of help to support self-care and management.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3