Digital Action Plan (Web App) for Managing Asthma Exacerbations: a Randomized Trial (Preprint)

Author:

Beydon Nicole,Taillé Camille,Corvol Harriet,Valcke Judith,Portal Jean-Jacques,Plantier Laurent,Mangiapan Gilles,Perisson Caroline,Aubertin Guillaume,Hadchouel Alice,Briend Guillaume,Guilleminault Laurent,Neukirch Catherine,Cros Pierrick,Appere de Vecchi Corinne,Mahut Bruno,Vicaut Eric,Delclaux ChristopheORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A written action plan (WAP) for managing asthma exacerbations is recommended.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effect on unscheduled medical contacts (UMCs) of a digital action plan (DAP) accessed via a smartphone Web application (app) combined with a WAP on paper versus the same WAP alone.

METHODS

This randomized, unblinded, multicenter (offline recruitment in private offices and public hospitals by physicians), parallel-group trial included asthma patients who were either children (6–12 years) or adults (18–60 years) and who had experienced at least one severe exacerbation in the previous year. They were randomized to WAP or DAP+WAP in a 1:1 ratio. The DAP (fully automated) provided treatment advice according to the severity and previous pharmacotherapy of the exacerbation. Participants were interviewed at three, six, nine, and 12 months to record exacerbations, UMCs, and WAP and DAP use, including the subjective evaluation (availability, usefulness) of the action plans, by a research nurse.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and eighty participants were randomized of whom 33 were excluded due to the absence of follow-up data after randomization, living 247 participants (93 children, 154 adults). The WAP group had 123 participants (45 children, mean age 8.3±2.0 years; and 78 adults, 36.3±12.7 years) and the DAP+WAP group 124 participants (48 children, 9.0±1.9 years; and 76 adults, 34.5±11.3 years). Overall, the annual severe exacerbation rate was 0.53. The mean UMC number/year was 0.31±0.62 in the WAP group and 0.37±0.82 in the DAP+WAP group (mean difference, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, -0.12 to 0.24, P=.823). Use per patient with at least one moderate or severe exacerbation was higher for the WAP (33/65 versus 15/63 for the DAP, P=.002). Thus, participants were more likely to use the WAP as compared to the DAP despite non-significant difference for the subjective evaluation of both action plans.

CONCLUSIONS

The DAP was used less often than the WAP and did not decrease the number of UMCs compared to the WAP alone.

CLINICALTRIAL

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869958

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3