The Physical and Psychological Effects of Telerehabilitation-based Exercise in Patients with Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Author:

Shi WeihongORCID,Zhang YuhangORCID,Bian Yanyan,Chen LixiaORCID,Yuan WangshuORCID,Zhang HouqiangORCID,Feng QiyangORCID,Zhang HuilingORCID,Liu DiORCID,Lin YeORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical therapy has demonstrated efficacy in managing non-specific low back pain (NLBP) among patients. Nevertheless, the prevalence of NLBP poses a challenge, as the existing medical infrastructure may be insufficient to care for the large patient population, particularly in geographically remote regions. Telerehabilitation emerges as a promising method to address this concern by offering a method to deliver superior medical care to a greater number of NLBP patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in patients with NLBP.

METHODS

Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, individuals with NLBP for a duration exceeding 3 months were enrolled in this study. Subsequently, a random allocation process assigned participants to either the telerehabilitation-based exercise group (TBEG) or the Outpatient-based exercise group (OBEG). All subjects engaged in a 30-minute regimen of strength and stretching exercises every two days for 8 weeks. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) served as the primary outcome measure, assessing physical disability. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, fear-avoidance tendencies, and quality of life, as shown by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Fear-Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ), and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), respectively.

RESULTS

54 out of 128 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned in the study. The findings indicate that the improvement observed in ODI scores within the TBEG group was comparable to that in the OBEG group at 2 weeks (mean difference -0.91, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -5.96 to 4.14, P=0.718), 4 weeks (mean difference -3.80, 95% CI -9.86 to -2.25, P=0.213), and 8 weeks (mean difference -3.24, 95% CI -8.65 to 2.17, P=0.235). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups at the 8-week mark regarding the FABQ (mean difference 8.88, 95% CI -2.29 to 20.06, P=0.116), NPRS (mean difference -0.39, 95% CI -2.10 to 1.31, P=0.642), and SF-36 scores (P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Telerehabitation interventions demonstrate comparable therapeutic efficacy for individuals with NLBP when compared to conventional outpatient-based physical therapy, yielding comparable outcomes in pain reduction and improvement in functional limitations.

CLINICALTRIAL

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300068984 ; (https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=189852)

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3