eHealth literacy and the use of NHS111 online in England: A cross-sectional survey (Preprint)

Author:

Turnbull JoanneORCID,Prichard JaneORCID,MacLellan JenniferORCID,Pope CatherineORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many healthcare systems have turned to digital technologies to support care delivery, a trend amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. ‘Digital first’ may exacerbate health inequalities due to variation in eHealth literacy.

OBJECTIVE

We explored eHealth literacy amongst users and non-users of the NHS 111 online urgent care service.

METHODS

A cross-sectional sequential convenience sample survey of 2754 adults (October 2020 - July 2021), from primary, urgent/emergency care, third sector organisations and NHS 111 website. The survey included the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), questions about use and preferences for using 111 online, and sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Across almost all domains of the eHLQ, NHS 111 online users had higher mean digital literacy scores than non-users (P<0.001). Four eHLQ domains were significant predictors of 111 online use, most highly significant for domain eHLQ1 (Using technology to process health information) and eHLQ3 (Ability to actively engage with digital services) with odds ratios (95% CI) of 1.86 (1.46 to 2.38) and 1.51 (1.22 to 1.88) respectively. Respondents reporting a long-term condition (LTC) had lower eHLQ scores and a subset of non-users with a LTC had the lowest eHLQ scores. People under 25 (OR (95% CI) 3.24 (1.87 to 5.62)), and those with formal qualifications (0.74 (0.55 to 0.99) were more likely to use 111 online. Users and non-users expressed willingness to use NHS 111 online for a range of symptoms, including chest pain symptoms (70.4%) or for illness in children (70.0%). Users of NHS 111 online were more likely to have also used other health services, particularly the 111 telephone service (X2=138.57; P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These differences in eHealth literacy scores amplify perennial concerns about digital exclusion and access to care for those impacted by intersecting forms of disadvantage, including long term illness. Although many appear willing to use NHS 111 online for a range of health scenarios, indicating broad acceptability, not all are able or willing to use this service. Despite a policy ambition for 111 online to substitute for other services, it appears to be used alongside other urgent care access routes, and thus may not reduce demand.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3