Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Symptom Management of Cancer Patients:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

Author:

Wu YuanORCID,Wang Nannan,Zhang Huichao,Zhang Yuxi

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the survival rate of cancer patients has been increasing, such patients often experience severe physical and psychological burdens due to the effects of the disease itself and therapy. Multiple virtual reality (VR)-based interventions have been used to help improve physical and psychological symptoms and quality of life in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effects of VR-based interventions on anxiety, pain, depression, fatigue, fear, distress, and quality of life in cancer patients.

METHODS

We conducted comprehensive searches in the PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and APA PsycINFO databases from their inception to 12 July 2022. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted articles that met strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessments of the included studies were performed according to the Cochrane risk assessment tool, and data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included in this review, and 15 (75%) were selected for meta-analysis. The results showed a significant difference between the VR and control groups for anxiety (standard mean difference [SMD] =−1.01, 95% CI −1.55 to −0.48, P<0.001), pain (SMD= −0.80, 95% CI −1.27 to −0.32, P<0.001), depression (SMD=−1.78, 95% CI −3.26 to −0.30, P=0.02), fear (MD=−0.82, 95% CI −1.60 to −0.03, P=0.04), distress (SMD=−1.16, 95% CI −1.96 to −0.37, P=0.004), and fatigue (SMD=−2.47, 95% CI −2.92 to −2.02, P<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed in quality of life (SMD=1.01, 95% CI −0.67 to 2.70, P=0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

VR interventions were effective in improving physical and psychological symptoms in cancer patients. Due to the limited number of studies, small sample sizes, and moderate to high heterogeneity, these results should be interpreted with caution. More rigorous, comprehensive and high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to validate the results of this study.

CLINICALTRIAL

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42022304931;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=304931

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3