Ecological momentary assessment of self-harm thoughts and behaviours: A systematic review of constructs from the Integrated Motivational-Volitional model (Preprint)

Author:

Winstone LizzyORCID,Heron JonORCID,John AnnORCID,Kirtley Olivia JORCID,Moran PaulORCID,Muehlenkamp JenniferORCID,O'Connor RoryORCID,Mars BeckyORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Integrated Motivational-Volitional (IMV) model is one of the leading theoretical models of suicidal thoughts and behaviour. There has been a recent proliferation in the assessment of suicidal and non-suicidal self-harm thoughts and behaviours (SHTBs) in daily life.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review synthesises evidence from ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies to address the following questions: i) Which constructs within the IMV model have been assessed using EMA, and how have they been assessed? ii) Do different constructs from the IMV model fluctuate in daily life? iii) What is the relationship between the different IMV constructs and SHTBs in daily life?

METHODS

Consistent with PRISMA guidelines, we conducted systematic searches of five databases – Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Europe PMC Preprints – from inception to 26th March 2024.

RESULTS

Our searches resulted in the inclusion and narrative synthesis of 53 studies across 58 papers. Fifteen IMV constructs were measured using EMA across included papers. The most frequently measured constructs were thwarted belongingness (24 studies), future thinking (20 studies) and perceived burdensomeness (16 studies). The least frequently measured were humiliation, social problem-solving, mental imagery, and perceived capability for suicide. None of the included papers measured memory biases, goals, norms, or resilience using EMA. Comparison of intra-class coefficients (45 studies) revealed inconsistency in, but at least moderate, within-person variance across all examined constructs. We found evidence (39 studies) of concurrent associations between almost all constructs and SHTBs in daily life, with some evidence that entrapment, shame, rumination, thwarted belongingness, hopelessness, social support and impulsivity are additionally associated with SHTBs in lagged (i.e. longitudinal) relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparisons were hindered by variation in methodology, including populations studied, EMA sampling scheme, operationalisation of IMV constructs and SHTBs, and statistical approach used. Our findings suggest that EMA studies are a useful methodology for examining risk factors for SHTB, however more research is needed for some IMV constructs. Quality assessment suggested several areas for how reporting EMA studies in this field might be improved.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3