Efficacy of an online intervention for treatment of depressive disorders: a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing guided and unguided self-help with waitlist control (Preprint)

Author:

Krämer Rico,Köhne-Volland Lea,Schumacher Anna,Köhler StephanORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health applications are efficacious treatment options for mild-to- moderate depressive disorders. However, the extent to which psychological guidance increases the efficacy of these applications is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the efficacy of the online intervention “Selfapy” for unipolar depression. We also investigated differences between a psychotherapist-guided vs. unguided version compared with those from a control group.

METHODS

A cohort of 401 participants with mild-to-severe depressive disorders were assigned randomly to either participate in a guided version of Selfapy (involving weekly telephone calls of 25-minute duration), an unguided version of Selfapy, or to the waiting list (control group). Selfapy is a cognitive behavioral therapy-based intervention for depressive disorders with a duration of 12 weeks. Symptom assessment was undertaken at T1 (before study entrance), T2 (after 6 weeks), T3 (post-treatment, after 12 weeks), and T4 (follow-up, after 6 months). The main outcome was reduction in depressive symptoms in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI- II) from T1 to T3. Secondary-outcome parameters were the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – Self Report (QIDS-SR-16), the Hamilton Rating Depression Scale (HRSD-24) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI).

RESULTS

A total of 301 out of 401 participants (75.1%) completed the post-measurement at T3. Changes in BDI-II from baseline differed significantly between groups at post-treatment with a significant effect of group (F(2,398) = 37.20, P<.001). Post-hoc analyses revealed a higher reduction for both intervention groups compared to the control group, with large between group effect sizes (guided vs. control: d=1.63 (95% CI 1.37-1.93); unguided vs. control: d=1.47 (95% CI 1.22-1.73)) at post-treatment. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups. Same results were established for all secondary outcomes. At follow-up (6 months), treatment effects on the primary outcome could be maintained for both intervention groups in the completer sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Selfapy is highly effective to reduce depressive symptoms in guided or unguided versions. Follow-up data suggest that these effects could be maintained. The guided version was not superior to the unguided version.

CLINICALTRIAL

Current Controlled Trial DRKS00017191; Date of registration: 14 May 2019.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.1186/s13063-021-05218-4

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3