Technology-assisted physical activity interventions for older people in their home-based environment: a scoping review (Preprint)

Author:

Dubbeldam RosemaryORCID,Stemplewski RafalORCID,Pavlova JuliiaORCID,Cyma-Wejchenig Magdalena,Lee SunwooORCID,Esser Patrick,Bentlage Ellen,Alcan Veysel,Çevik Özge Selin,Epiphaniou Eleni,Gallè Francesca,Langeard AntoineORCID,Gafner Simone,Ahmed Mona,Bandura Niharika,Erden Güner Arzu,Göz Evrim,Kara Ilke,Kabuk Ayşe,Türkoglu Ilayda,Pajalic ZadaORCID,Vindiš Jan,Jaksic DamjanORCID,Verep Uǧur,Chouvarda Ioanna,Simovska VeraORCID,Netz Yael,Pelcova Jana

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

Technology-assisted physical activity interventions for older adults in their home-based environment have been used to promote physical activity. While previous reviews focused on health-related outcomes of such interventions, this scoping review explores the characteristics of the technology in relation to the characteristics of populations, exercise types and usability in terms of adverse events, drop-outs, adherence and user experience. We identified 8496 sources. After title and abstract screening, 455 full texts were assessed, and 148 were included, representing 12,717 participants aged 74 (SD 6) years. In total, 93 (63%) sources reported on the population’s health status. The main purpose of the interventions was balance (51%), and strength and power (43%) and intervention purposes were not related to embedded technology. In studies where the participant’s health status was reported as healthy, 53% implemented exergames compared to only 27% in studies with participants with a clinical condition. Mobile apps (20%) and trackers (11%) were implemented likewise in both groups. The technology was embedded to provide continuous exercise information (27%) and exercise feedback (27%) or to record real-time movement data (26%). Adverse events were reported in 68 (46%) of the sources with three quarters (49 sources) reporting no adverse events. Only 2 mild events were related to technology. Dropout rates were reported in 100 (68%) studies, with no differences between intervention (16±16%) and control (14±12%) groups. Dropout reasons related to technology in 3%. Adherence was reported in 78 studies (53%) and was slightly higher in the intervention group (80±18%) compared to the control group (71±25%). A significantly higher adherence was found between interventions that were tailored (83 ± 15%) versus those that were not (75±21%). General enjoyment of the technology was captured in 55 studies (37%) and was rated positive (91%), neutral (7%) or negative (2%). Occasionally reported wishes were related to goal setting, feedback, technical support, exercise variation, and social setting. In conclusion, various technologies were successfully used in healthy and clinical older populations. The embedded technology was not a reason for additional dropouts, lead to slightly better adherence, and adverse events were rarely related to technology. When assessed, the technology was well accepted and positively enjoyed.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3