Exploring perception differences in AI medical chatbot trust: Comparison of Robot perception and human perception by PLS-MGA (Preprint)

Author:

Liu XiaochenORCID,Yu Xintao,Liu Jingyu

Abstract

BACKGROUND

AI-driven medical chatbots allow patients to seek consultations without the constraints of time and space. Despite the rapid advancements and, in some cases, superior performance of AI medical chatbots compared to human physicians in specific domains, user hesitation persists. Furthermore, AI medical chatbots are still relatively new to patients in China. Understanding how patients' perceptions (AI versus human physicians) influence the trust-building process is crucial for the broader adoption of this technology.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore how different perception (Robot and Human-like) of users build trust in AI medical chatbot. Moreover, this study examines the moderating role of privacy concern on trust in technology and trust in AI.

METHODS

PLS-MGA was adopted with data collected from 1547 participants, both online and offline, to examine the empirical results.

RESULTS

Perceived ease of use (β = .433, p < .001), privacy concern (β = .079, p = .006), and brand reputation (β = .264, p < .001) were positively associated with trust in technology and trust in brand. Trust in brand (β = .151, p < .001) positively influenced trust in technology, and trust in technology significantly predicted trust in AI across all dimensions: cognition (β = .20, p < .001), information (β = .19, p < .001), and behavior (β = .17, p < .001). Privacy concern moderated the relationship between trust in technology and trust in AI (β = .11, p = .001), information (β = .08, p < .001), and behavior (β = .09, p < .001). No significant differences were found for AI experience, health status, and perceived risk. However, the paths for perceived ease of use, trust in brand, and trust in technology (benevolence) were significantly stronger in the human group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes both theoretically and practically by advancing the current understanding of the trust-building process in AI healthcare. It also examines the moderating effect of privacy concerns in the trust-building process within the AI healthcare context.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3