Ethical Imperatives in Digital Health Research: Promoting Equity and Empowering Patients (Preprint)

Author:

Agarwal Sachin,Kronish Ian M.ORCID

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

The democratization of digital health technologies in research necessitates a steadfast commitment to the foundational principles of bioethics: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. All stakeholders within the digital health ecosystem, including researchers and industry players, must actively integrate bioethical considerations such as privacy, security, data governance, and equitable distribution of benefits into the development and deployment of digital health tools. Researchers bear a responsibility to engage patient stakeholders throughout the design and testing phases of digital health interventions. This inclusive approach fosters trust and enhances participation in research studies. Just as in medical decisions, respecting patient autonomy entails facilitating active involvement in decision-making processes and providing accessible, timely, and comprehensive information in lay-friendly and multi-lingual formats. Given the dearth of evidence in established frameworks and informational strategies to enhance digital health literacy, the global digital health community must adopt a more deliberate and coordinated approach to identifying and addressing these research gaps. By doing so, we can ensure that the benefits of digital health technologies are equitably distributed and that individuals are empowered to make informed decisions about their health and well-being.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3