Competitive Residency Match Rate: Does Having a Home Program Make a Difference? (Preprint)

Author:

Niu Ashley VivianORCID,Manhas PriyaORCID,Pathak Akash,Chen DavidORCID,Tong AnhthoORCID,Park David,Zhang HannahORCID,Maheta BhagvatORCID,Goswami Caroline,Noon Aleeha,Wong MichaelORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

On average, competitive specialties have significantly lower match rates, and the competitiveness continues to rise each year. Besides test scores, applicants need to demonstrate interest in research, leadership, and clinical experience—opportunities often more accessible at schools with a home residency program.

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses how home programs impact residency match rate for competitive specialties, aiming to enhance program directors’ assessment of applicants, guide medical school advisors, and aid students in strengthening their residency candidacy.

METHODS

12,489 US MD medical school graduates from 2019 to 2023 were assessed retrospectively. Match lists published on each institution’s official website and the Office of Student Affairs provided data for 152 US MD programs. Characteristics examined included Alpha Omega Alpha and Gold Humanism Honor Society chapter status, home residency program, and number of specialty faculty. An odds ratio (OR) analysis was conducted to determine the likelihood medical students with a home program matched into a competitive specialty compared to those without.

RESULTS

984 competitive residency programs had school affiliations and 660 lacked affiliations. Of the matched applicants in a competitive specialty, 10,541 attended an institution affiliated with a residency program resulting in a statistically significant 2.0% match rate for students with a home program versus 1.1% match rate for students without a home program (OR: 1.73) (p<0.01). Applicants with and without a home program matched 58.3% and 52.7% into academic (OR: 1.25), emphasizing the advantageous impact of a home program.

CONCLUSIONS

US MD graduates with a home program were nearly twice as likely to match into their competitive specialty of choice, possibly attributed to more clinical exposure, strong faculty relationships, and application support. This study demonstrates lack of a home program disadvantages applicants and may contribute to disparities in acceptances in competitive specialties.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3