A protocol of protocols to explore whether humans will continue in meaningful decision-making roles in an AI-driven future in complex health services (Preprint)

Author:

Doreswamy NandiniORCID,Horstmanshof LouiseORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care can broadly be divided into two domains: clinical health services and complex health services, i.e., non-clinical health services such as health policy and health regulation. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming both these areas. Currently, humans are leaders, managers, and decision makers in complex health services. However, with the rise of AI, the time has come to ask whether humans will continue to have meaningful decision-making roles in this domain.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to establish a protocol of protocols to be used in the proposed research, which aims to explore whether humans will continue in meaningful decision-making roles in complex health services in an AI-driven future.

METHODS

The proposed research is designed as a four-step project, divided into two phases. In keeping with this design, the overarching protocol encompasses (i) the protocol for a scoping review that aims to identify and map human attributes that influence decision-making in complex health services; (ii) the protocol for a scoping review that aims to identify and map AI attributes that influence decision-making in this context; (iii) the protocol for a comparative analysis of human and AI attributes identified in the reviews; and (iv) the protocol for a simulation that tests the likelihood of humans competing, cooperating, or converging with AI in order to continue in meaningful decision-making roles in this context.

RESULTS

The results will be presented in tabular form, as well as visually intuitive formats.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper provides a roadmap for the proposed research. It also provides an example of a protocol of protocols for methods used in complex health research. While there are established guidelines for a priori protocols for scoping reviews, there is a paucity of guidance on establishing a protocol of protocols. This paper takes the first step towards building a scaffolding for future guidelines in this regard.

CLINICALTRIAL

This protocol of protocols has not been registered.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3