Contemporary databases for real-world studies for three diverse healthcare systems in Asia: a scoping review for India, Thailand, and Taiwan (Preprint)

Author:

Shau Wen-Yi,Setia SajitaORCID,Shinde Salil,Santoso HandokoORCID,Furtner DanielORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

real-world data (RWD) relating to patient health status and/or the delivery of healthcare can be broadly defined as data collected outside of conventional clinical trials in the context of databases, treatment and disease registries, electronic medical records, insurance claims, and information directly contributed by healthcare professionals and/or the patients themselves. RWD is used to generate real-world evidence, which is increasingly relevant to policymakers in Asia to support decision-making from several perspectives, including public health policy, regulatory, health technology assessments, and reimbursement, and to set priorities or inform (clinical) practice.

OBJECTIVE

To support the purpose of achieving the benefits of RWE in Asian healthcare strategy and policy, we sought to identify linked contemporary databases used in real-world studies in three representative countries (India, Thailand, and Taiwan) to reflect the diversity in Asia by performing a systematic scoping review. In this article, we describe the protocol and preliminary literature search for the scoping review.

METHODS

The PubMed search strategy covered three concepts. Concept 1 was designed to identify potential RWE/RWD studies by applying a variety of MeSH terms (“Treatment Outcome”, “Evidence-Based Medicine”, “Retrospective Studies”, “Time Factors”) and related keywords (e.g. “real-world”, “actual life”, “actual practice”). Concept 2 introduced the three countries (India, Taiwan, and Thailand). Concept 3 focused on data types, by using a combination of MeSH terms (“Electronic Health Records”, “Insurance, Health”, “Registries”, “Databases, Pharmaceutical”, “Pharmaceutical Services”) and related keywords (e.g., electronic medical record, electronic healthcare record, EMR, EHR, administrative database, registry). These searches were combined with filters for the English language and publications in the last 5 years before the search. In the next step, the retrieved articles will undergo two screening phases (phase 1: review of the title and abstract; phase 2: review of full text) in order to identify relevant and eligible articles for data extraction. Data to be extracted from eligible studies will include characteristics of the database itself, region(s) covered, and the patient population.

RESULTS

The literature search was conducted on Sep 27, 2022 and retrieved 3,172,434 (concept 1), 1,094,125 (concept 2), and 672,794 (concept 3) articles. After applying all three concepts together with the language and publication date filters, 2,277 articles were identified. These articles will be further screened to identify eligible studies. Based on phase 1 screening to date, we estimate that approximately 20% (~450) of the articles will require full-text review to judge their eligibility, and that 100–200 studies will be used for data extraction.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that this research will be crucial in nurturing advancement in RWD generation in Asia by identifying linked clinical RWD databases and identifying new avenues for public-private partnerships and multiple collaborations to expand the scope and spectrum of high-quality, robust RWE generation in Asia.

CLINICALTRIAL

NA

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3