Leading Journals in ChatGPT Articles with More References Co-citations Using Slope Graphs in R with Web R-Platform: Bibliometric Analysis (Preprint)

Author:

Chow Julie ChiORCID,Yeh Yu-Tsen,Chou Willy

Abstract

BACKGROUND

ChatGPT has sparked numerous innovative applications in healthcare, with PubMed currently indexing 2,692 articles on the topic. However, there is no available information on which journals have more references co-citations in ChatGPT articles and their thematic features.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to answer three key questions: (1) How can major themes be extracted from ChatGPT-related articles to respective journals? (2) Does the number of Chinese publications in ChatGPT merely lag behind that of American authors? (3) Which journals have more references co-citations in ChatGPT articles, and what characteristics do these articles share based on ChatGPT keywords?

METHODS

We collected 2,489 articles with "ChatGPT" in their titles from the Web of Science core collection, gathering metadata from 2022 onwards. To analyze these articles, we employed various visualization methods, focusing on slope graphs to compare trends in prestigious journals based on three aspects: the overall number of publications, the top 100 cited articles, and references co-citations on journals. We created performance sheets, network charts of author collaborations and co-words for 2,489 articles, and an impact beam plot for the top 100 cited articles. Additionally, we used the follower-leading clustering algorithm (FLCA) for clustering analysis, which efficiently identified research focal points and emerging trends.

RESULTS

The study revealed the following findings: (1) Three major themes emerged from the top 20 keywords: ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE, IMPACT, and QUALITY; (2) The number of ChatGPT research publications by Chinese authors still merely lagged behind those by US authors; (3) The prestigious journals leading in references co-citations among ChatGPT articles were Nature and the Journal of Medical Internet Research(JMIR); (4) Both journals were classified as ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE in nature.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified three major themes (ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE, IMPACT, QUALITY), confirmed US dominance in ChatGPT research over China, and highlighted Nature and JMIR as leading journals in references co-citations among ChatGPT articles, both focusing on artificial intelligence. Based on the results of this study, slope graphs created in R on web R-platform can be applied to research, not just ChatGPT articles.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3