Handheld computer devices to support clinical decision-making in acute nursing practice: a systematic scoping review (Preprint)

Author:

Glanville DavidORCID,Khaw DamienORCID,Hutchinson Anastasia

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing care is increasingly supported by computerised information systems and decision-support aids. Since the advent of Handheld Computer Devices (HCDs) there has been limited exploration of their use in nursing practice.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the professional and clinical impacts of nurse use of mobile health applications to assist clinical decision-making in acute care settings. To explore the scope of published research and identify key nomenclature with respect to research into this emerging field within nursing practice.

METHODS

This scoping review involved a tripartite search of electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar) using (1) preliminary, (2) broad, and (3) comprehensive search terms. Included studies were hand-searched for additional citations. Two researchers independently screened studies for inclusion and appraised quality using structured critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

Of the 2,309 unique studies screened, 28 were included in final analyses: randomized controlled trials (n = 3); and quasi-experimental (n = 9), observational (n =10), mixed-methods (n = 2), qualitative-descriptive (n = 2), and diagnostic accuracy (n = 2) studies. Studies investigated the impact of HCDs on nurse decisions (n = 12, 42.9%), the effectiveness, safety, and quality of care (n = 9, 32.1%), and HCD usability, uptake, and acceptance (n = 14, 50%), and were judged to contain moderate-to-high risk of bias. The terminology used to describe HCDs was heterogenous across studies, comprising 24 unique descriptors and 17 individual concepts that reflected three discrete technology platforms (‘PDA technology, ‘Smartphone / tablet technology’, ‘Healthcare-specific technology’). Study findings varied, as did the range of decision-making modalities targeted by HCD interventions. Interventions varied according to the level of clinician versus algorithmic judgment: unstructured clinical judgment; structured clinical judgment; computerised algorithmic judgment.

CONCLUSIONS

The extant literature is varied but suggests that HCDs can be used effectively to support aspects of acute nursing care. However, there is a dearth of high-level evidence into this phenomenon and studies exploring the degree to which HCD implementation may affect acute nursing care delivery workflow. Additional targeted research using rigorous experimental designs is needed in this emerging field to determine their true potential in optimising acute nursing care.

CLINICALTRIAL

not applicable

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3