Exploring Resource Sharing behaviors in an Online Ovarian Cancer Community (Preprint)

Author:

Thaker Khushboo MaulikmihirORCID,Chi YuORCID,He DaqingORCID,Brusilovsky PeterORCID,Lee Young,Birkhoff SusanORCID,Hui Chi Ching VivianORCID,Rosenbum Leah,Donovan Heidi

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online health communities (OHCs) provide ovarian cancer (OvCa) patients, survivors, and their caregivers assistance beyond their traditional support channels. OvCa OHC promotes connection and exchange information among users who had similar experiences. This exchange of information often leads to resource sharing amongst users, as web links within online communities.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine if any of OvCa OHC users’ resource sharing behaviors are associated with the relevance of these resources. Three resource sharing behaviors were considered: types of resource shared, the purpose of sharing the resource and OHC users’ reactions to resource sharing

METHODS

Using a retrospective design, data were extracted from the National Ovarian Cancer Coalition (NOCC) discussion forum. Resource relevance was categorized to three levels (relevant, partially relevant and not relevant). Resource sharing behaviors were identified through manual content analysis. The chi-square test was used to evaluate associations between resource relevance and resource sharing behaviors

RESULTS

Among the resources shared, 49.43% were identified as relevant, 29.54% were partially relevant and 22.16% were not relevant. From the investigated resource sharing behavior, the study established a significant association between types of resource shared (X2=33.2771, p<0.05) and purpose of resource sharing (X2 =22.9210, p<0.05) with resource relevance (based on chi-square test of independence). Types of resource shared revealed that health consumer materials including health news and health organizations had significantly more relevant resources. Patient educational materials and patient generated resources were more significantly related to partially relevant and irrelevant resources respectively. Health professional materials including academic literature were shared a few times but have significantly more relevant resources. Purpose of sharing, including additional readings and pointing to resources, had significantly more relevant resources, while subjects for discussion and to stay connected did not have any relevant resources shared.

CONCLUSIONS

The associations found between the resource sharing behaviors and relevance of these resources can help in collect possible relevant resources from these forums along with their information needs on a large scale through automation. The study also reveals, when an intervention is required for handling the needs of OvCa OHC users

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3