Evaluating the Sickle Cell Data Collection Program’s Administrative Case Definition for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease (Preprint)

Author:

Singh AshimaORCID,Sontag Marci KORCID,Zhou MeiORCID,Dasgupta MahuaORCID,Crume Tessa,McLemore Morgan,Galadanci NajibahORCID,Randall Eldrida,Steiner NicoleORCID,Brandow Amanda M,Koch KathrynORCID,Field Joshua J,Hassell KathrynORCID,Snyder Angela BORCID,Kanter JulieORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sickle cell disease (SCD) was first recognized in 1910 and identified as a genetic condition in 1949. However, there is not a universal clinical registry that can be used currently to estimate prevalence. The Sickle Cell Data Collection (SCDC) program, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, funds state-level grantees to compile data within their states from various sources including administrative claims to identify individuals with SCD. The performance of the SCDC administrative claims case definition has been validated in a pediatric population with SCD, but it has not been tested in adults.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study is to evaluate the discriminatory ability of the SCDC administrative claims case definition to accurately identify adult SCD cases using Medicaid insurance claims data.

METHODS

Our study uses Medicaid claims data in combination with hospital-based medical record data from the Alabama (AL), Georgia (GA), and Wisconsin (WI) SCDC programs to identify individuals 18 years of age or older meeting the SCDC administrative claims case definition. In order to validate this definition, our study included only those subjects that were identified in both Medicaid and the partnering clinical institution. We used clinical laboratory tests and diagnostic algorithms to determine the true SCD status of this subset. Positive predictive values (PPV) are reported overall and by state under several scenarios.

RESULTS

There were 1,219 individuals (354 from AL and 865 from GA) who were identified using a 5-year time period. The 5-year time period yielded a PPV of 88.4% (91% for data from AL, 87% for data from GA), when only using data with lab-confirmed (gold standard) cases as true positives. With a narrower time period (3-year period) and data from three states (AL, GA and WI), there were a total of 1,432 individuals from these states included in our study. The 3-year time period PPV overall was 89.4% (92%, 93% and 81% for data from AL, GA and WI respectively) when only considering lab-confirmed cases as true cases

CONCLUSIONS

Adults identified as having SCD from administrative claims data using the SCDC case definition have a high probability of truly having the disease especially if those hospitals have active SCD programs. Administrative claims are thus a valuable data source to identify adults with SCD in a state and understand their epidemiology and healthcare service utilization.

CLINICALTRIAL

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3