Abstract
Background
Online healthcare communities are changing the ways of physician-patient communication and how patients choose outpatient care physicians. Although a majority of empirical work has examined the role of online reviews in consumer decisions, less research has been done in health care, and endogeneity of online reviews has not been fully considered. Moreover, the important factor of physician online services has been neglected in patient decisions.
Objective
In this paper, we addressed the endogeneity of online reviews and examined the impact of online reviews and services on outpatient visits based on theories of reviews and channel effects.
Methods
We used a difference-in-difference approach to account for physician- and website-specific effects by collecting information from 474 physician homepages on two online health care communities.
Results
We found that the number of reviews was more effective in influencing patient decisions compared with the overall review rating. An improvement in reviews leads to a relative increase in physician outpatient visits on that website. There are channel effects in health care: online services complement offline services (outpatient care appointments). Results further indicate that online services moderate the relationship between online reviews and physician outpatient visits.
Conclusions
This study investigated the effect of reviews and channel effects in health care by conducting a difference-in-difference analysis on two online health care communities. Our findings provide basic research on online health care communities.
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics
Reference57 articles.
1. The Effect of Online Reviews on Physician Demand: A Structural Model of Patient Choice
2. FoxSDugganMHealth online 2013201301152019-10-19WashingtonPew Internet and American Life Projecthttps://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
3. IfengPhoenix New Media201106242019-10-19More Chinese patients search online before seeking medical treatment offlinehttp://news.ifeng.com/gundong/detail_2011_06/24/7232672_0.shtml
4. HarrisKBuntinMChoosing a health care provider: the role of quality information20082019-10-19https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dcfe/5b064f7160a72af7d038f8e7362cfcad7577.pdf
5. Five-star Doctors for the 21st Century
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献