Converge or Collide? Making Sense of a Plethora of Open Data Standards in Health Care

Author:

Tsafnat GuyORCID,Dunscombe RachelORCID,Gabriel DaveraORCID,Grieve GrahameORCID,Reich ChristianORCID

Abstract

Practitioners of digital health are familiar with disjointed data environments that often inhibit effective communication among different elements of the ecosystem. This fragmentation leads in turn to issues such as inconsistencies in services versus payments, wastage, and notably, care delivered being less than best-practice. Despite the long-standing recognition of interoperable data as a potential solution, efforts in achieving interoperability have been disjointed and inconsistent, resulting in numerous incompatible standards, despite the widespread agreement that fewer standards would enhance interoperability. This paper introduces a framework for understanding health care data needs, discussing the challenges and opportunities of open data standards in the field. It emphasizes the necessity of acknowledging diverse data standards, each catering to specific viewpoints and needs, while proposing a categorization of health care data into three domains, each with its distinct characteristics and challenges, along with outlining overarching design requirements applicable to all domains and specific requirements unique to each domain.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Reference12 articles.

1. Guide to Health Informatics

2. Why digital medicine depends on interoperability

3. Methods Used in the Development of Common Data Models for Health Data: Scoping Review

4. HandlerTHoltmeierRMetzgerJOverhageMTaylorSUnderwoodCHIMSS electronic health record definitional model version 1.0ResearchGate20032024-04-04https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247151484_HIMSS_electronic_health_record_definitional_model_version_10

5. United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI)Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology2020072024-04-04https://www.healthit.gov/isa/sites/isa/files/2020-10/USCDI-Version-1-July-2020-Errata-Final_0.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3