Abstract
Background
The wide availability of internet-connected devices and new sensor technologies increasingly infuse longitudinal observational study designs and cohort studies. Simultaneously, the costly and time-consuming nature of traditional cohorts has given rise to alternative, technology-driven designs such as eCohorts, which remain inadequately described in the scientific literature.
Objective
The aim of this study was to outline and discuss what may constitute an eCohort, as well as to formulate a first working definition for health researchers based on a review of the relevant literature.
Methods
A two-staged review and synthesis process was performed comparing 10 traditional cohorts and 10 eCohorts across the six core steps in the life cycle of cohort designs.
Results
eCohorts are a novel type of technology-driven cohort study that are not physically linked to a clinical setting, follow more relaxed and not necessarily random sampling procedures, are primarily based on self-reported and digitally collected data, and systematically aim to leverage the internet and digitalization to achieve flexibility, interactivity, patient-centeredness, and scalability. This approach comes with some hurdles such as data quality, generalizability, and privacy concerns.
Conclusions
eCohorts have similarities to their traditional counterparts; however, they are sufficiently distinct to be treated as a separate type of cohort design. The novelty of eCohorts is associated with a range of strengths and weaknesses that require further exploration.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Informatics
Reference40 articles.
1. Observational Studies: Cohort and Case-Control Studies
2. A History of Epidemiologic Methods and Concepts
3. Boston UniversityNational Institutes of HealthNational Heart, Lung and Blood InstituteFramingham Heart Study2020-08-12https://framinghamheartstudy.org
4. Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthNurses' Health Study2020-07-07https://www.nurseshealthstudy.org/
5. UCL Centre for Longitudinal Studies1958 National Child Development Study2020-08-12https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/cls-studies/1958-national-child-development-study/
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献