Affiliation:
1. University of Florida Health
2. University of Florida
Abstract
Background
Machine learning–enabled clinical information systems (ML-CISs) have the potential to drive health care delivery and research. The Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) data standard has been increasingly applied in developing these systems. However, methods for applying FHIR to ML-CISs are variable.
Objective
This study evaluates and compares the functionalities, strengths, and weaknesses of existing systems and proposes guidelines for optimizing future work with ML-CISs.
Methods
Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for articles describing machine learning systems that were used for clinical data analytics or decision support in compliance with FHIR standards. Information regarding each system’s functionality, data sources, formats, security, performance, resource requirements, scalability, strengths, and limitations was compared across systems.
Results
A total of 39 articles describing FHIR-based ML-CISs were divided into the following three categories according to their primary focus: clinical decision support systems (n=18), data management and analytic platforms (n=10), or auxiliary modules and application programming interfaces (n=11). Model strengths included novel use of cloud systems, Bayesian networks, visualization strategies, and techniques for translating unstructured or free-text data to FHIR frameworks. Many intelligent systems lacked electronic health record interoperability and externally validated evidence of clinical efficacy.
Conclusions
Shortcomings in current ML-CISs can be addressed by incorporating modular and interoperable data management, analytic platforms, secure interinstitutional data exchange, and application programming interfaces with adequate scalability to support both real-time and prospective clinical applications that use electronic health record platforms with diverse implementations.
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics
Reference77 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Early release of selected estimates based on data from the 2018 National Health Interview Survey. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/releases/released201905.htm [2023]
2. Uses of electronic health records for public health surveillance to advance public health;Birkhead;Annu Rev Public Health
3. Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital “advanced use” divide;Adler-Milstein;J Am Med Inform Assoc
4. Stanford Medicine. Stanford Medicine 2017 health trends report: harnessing the power of data in health. 2017. https://med.stanford.edu/content/dam/sm/sm-news/documents/StanfordMedicineHealthTrendsWhitePaper2017.pdf [2023]
5. Record fragmentation due to transfusion at multiple health care facilities: a risk factor for delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions;Unni;Transfusion
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献