Abstract
Background
Various technological interventions have been proposed and studied to address the growing demand for care of residents in assisted living facilities, in which a preexisting shortage of professional caregivers has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Care robots are one such intervention with the potential to improve both the care of older adults and the work life of their professional caregivers. However, concerns about efficacy, ethics, and best practices in the applications of robotic technologies in care settings remain.
Objective
This scoping review aimed to examine the literature on robots used in assisted living facilities and identify gaps in the literature to guide future research.
Methods
On February 12, 2022, following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) protocol, we searched PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore digital library, and ACM Digital Library using predetermined search terms. Publications were included if they were written in English and focused on the use of robotics in assisted living facilities. Publications were excluded if they did not provide peer-reviewed empirical data, focused on user needs, or developed an instrument to study human-robot interaction. The study findings were then summarized, coded, and analyzed using the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice, and Research recommendations framework.
Results
The final sample included 73 publications from 69 unique studies on the use of robots in assisted living facilities. The findings of studies on older adults were mixed, with some studies suggesting positive impacts of robots, some expressing concerns about robots and barriers to their use, and others being inconclusive. Although many therapeutic benefits of care robots have been identified, methodological limitations have weakened the internal and external validity of the findings of these studies. Few studies (18/69, 26%) considered the context of care: most studies (48/69, 70%) collected data only on recipients of care, 15 studies collected data on staff, and 3 studies collected data on relatives or visitors. Theory-driven, longitudinal, and large sample size study designs were rare. Across the authors’ disciplines, a lack of consistency in methodological quality and reporting makes it difficult to synthesize and assess research on care robotics.
Conclusions
The findings of this study call for more systematic research on the feasibility and efficacy of robots in assisted living facilities. In particular, there is a dearth of research on how robots may change geriatric care and the work environment within assisted living facilities. To maximize the benefits and minimize the consequences for older adults and caregivers, future research will require interdisciplinary collaboration among health sciences, computer science, and engineering as well as agreement on methodological standards.
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Health Informatics,Gerontology,Health (social science)
Reference116 articles.
1. VespaJArmstrongDMedinaLDemographic turning points for the United States : population projections for 2020 to 2060United States Census Bureau202022022-04-25https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2020/demo/p25-1144.html
2. How much care will you need?LongTermCare.gov2022-07-29https://acl.gov/ltc/basic-needs/how-much-care-will-you-need
3. Survey: nearly every U.S. nursing home and assisted living community is facing a workforce crisisThe American Health Care Association and National Center for Assisted Living20219222022-05-23https://tinyurl.com/4ub6xfr3
4. Historic staffing shortages continue to force nursing homes to limit new admissions, creating bottlenecks at hospitals and reducing access to care for seniorsThe American Health Care Association and National Center for Assisted Living20227142022-07-29https://tinyurl.com/44cjx8ea
5. The use of care robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature