Abstract
Background
The literature abounds with increasing numbers of research studies using genomic data in combination with health data (eg, health records and phenotypic and lifestyle data), with great potential for large-scale research and precision medicine. However, concerns have been raised about social acceptability and risks posed for individuals and their kin. Although there has been public engagement on various aspects of this topic, there is a lack of information about public views on data access models.
Objective
This study aimed to address the lack of information on the social acceptability of access models for reusing genomic data collected for research in conjunction with health data. Models considered were open web-based access, released externally to researchers, and access within a data safe haven.
Methods
Views were ascertained using a series of 8 public workshops (N=116). The workshops included an explanation of benefits and risks in using genomic data with health data, a facilitated discussion, and an exit questionnaire. The resulting quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and the qualitative data were analyzed for emerging themes.
Results
Respondents placed a high value on the reuse of genomic data but raised concerns including data misuse, information governance, and discrimination. They showed a preference for giving consent and use of data within a safe haven over external release or open access. Perceived risks with open access included data being used by unscrupulous parties, with external release included data security, and with safe havens included the need for robust safeguards.
Conclusions
This is the first known study exploring public views of access models for reusing anonymized genomic and health data in research. It indicated that people are generally amenable but prefer data safe havens because of perceived sensitivities. We recommend that public views be incorporated into guidance on models for the reuse of genomic and health data.
Reference28 articles.
1. National Human Genome Research Institute2018The Cost of Sequencing a Human Genome
https://www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts/
2. GOV.UK2016Chief Medical Officer Annual Report 2016: Generation Genome
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/chief-medical-officer-annual-report-2016-generation-genome
3. Genomics England2019The 100,000 Genomes Project
https://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/about-genomics-england/the-100000-genomes-project/
4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) — All of Us2019https://allofus.nih.gov/
5. Genome Canada2019https://www.genomecanada.ca/en
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献