An Alternative to the Light Touch Digital Health Remote Study: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study

Author:

Goodday Sarah MORCID,Karlin EmmaORCID,Alfarano AlexandriaORCID,Brooks AlexaORCID,Chapman CarolORCID,Desille RachelleORCID,Karlin Daniel RORCID,Emami HooraORCID,Woods Nancy FugateORCID,Boch AdrienORCID,Foschini LucaORCID,Wildman MackenzieORCID,Cormack FrancescaORCID,Taptiklis NickORCID,Pratap AbhishekORCID,Ghassemi MarzyehORCID,Goldenberg AnnaORCID,Nagaraj SujayORCID,Walsh ElaineORCID,Friend StephenORCID,

Abstract

Background Several app-based studies share similar characteristics of a light touch approach that recruit, enroll, and onboard via a smartphone app and attempt to minimize burden through low-friction active study tasks while emphasizing the collection of passive data with minimal human contact. However, engagement is a common challenge across these studies, reporting low retention and adherence. Objective This study aims to describe an alternative to a light touch digital health study that involved a participant-centric design including high friction app-based assessments, semicontinuous passive data from wearable sensors, and a digital engagement strategy centered on providing knowledge and support to participants. Methods The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study included US frontline health care workers followed between May and November 2020. The study comprised 3 main components: (1) active and passive assessments of stress and symptoms from a smartphone app, (2) objective measured assessments of acute stress from wearable sensors, and (3) a participant codriven engagement strategy that centered on providing knowledge and support to participants. The daily participant time commitment was an average of 10 to 15 minutes. Retention and adherence are described both quantitatively and qualitatively. Results A total of 365 participants enrolled and started the study, and 81.0% (n=297) of them completed the study for a total study duration of 4 months. Average wearable sensor use was 90.6% days of total study duration. App-based daily, weekly, and every other week surveys were completed on average 69.18%, 68.37%, and 72.86% of the time, respectively. Conclusions This study found evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of a participant-centric digital health study approach that involved building trust with participants and providing support through regular phone check-ins. In addition to high retention and adherence, the collection of large volumes of objective measured data alongside contextual self-reported subjective data was able to be collected, which is often missing from light touch digital health studies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04713111; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04713111

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference57 articles.

1. VogelsEAAbout one-in-five Americans use a smart watch or fitness trackerPew Research Center2020-06-05https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/01/09/about-one-in-five-americans-use-a-smart-watch-or-fitness-tracker

2. SilverLSmartphone ownership is growing rapidly around the world, but not always equallyPew Research Center2021-06-06https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/02/05/smartphone-ownership-is-growing-rapidly-around-the-world-but-not-always-equally/

3. Global mobile consumer trends: second edition: mobile continues its global reach into all aspects of consumers’ livesDeloitte202106062021-06-06https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/global-mobile-consumer-trends.html

4. Turning the Crisis Into an Opportunity: Digital Health Strategies Deployed During the COVID-19 Outbreak

5. App-enabled trial participation: Tectonic shift or tepid rumble?

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3