Abstract
Background
Significant chronic disease challenges exist among older adults. However, most older adults want to remain at home even if their health conditions challenge their ability to live independently. Yet publicly funded home care resources are scarce, private home care is expensive, and family/friend caregivers have limited capacity. Many older adults with chronic illness would require institutional care without the support from family member/friend caregivers. This role raises the risk of physical health problems, stress, burnout, and depression. Passive remote monitoring (RM), the use of sensors that do not require any action by the individual for the system to work, may increase the older adult’s ability to live independently while also providing support and peace of mind to both the client and the family member/friend caregiver.
Objective
This paper presents the protocol of a study conducted in two provinces in Canada to investigate the impact of RM along with usual home care (the intervention) versus usual home care alone (control) on older adults with complex care. The primary outcome for this study is the occurrence of and time to events such as trips to emergency, short-term admission to the hospital, terminal admission to the hospital awaiting admission to long-term care, and direct admission to long-term care. The secondary outcomes for this study are (1) health care costs, (2) client functional status and quality of life in the home, (3) family/friend caregiver stress, and (4) family/friend caregiver functional health status.
Methods
The design for this study is an unblinded pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PRCT) with two parallel arms in two geographic strata (Ontario and Nova Scotia). Quantitative and qualitative methodologies will be used to address the study objectives. This PRCT is conceptually informed by the principles of client-centered care and viewing the family as the client and aims at providing supported self-management.
Results
This study is supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. A primary completion date is anticipated in fall 2022.
Conclusions
Findings from this real-world rigorous randomized trial will support Canadian decision-makers, providers, and clients and their caregivers in assessing the health, well-being, and economic benefits and the social and technological challenges of integrating RM technologies to support older adults to stay in their home, including evaluating the impact on the burden of care experienced by family/friend caregivers. With an aging population, this technology may reduce institutionalization and promote safe and independent living for the elderly as long as possible.
Trial Registration
International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 79884651; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN79884651
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)
DERR1-10.2196/15027
Reference44 articles.
1. House of Commons Standing Committee on HealthChronic diseases related to aging and health promotion and disease prevention: report of the standing committee on health20122019-10-20OttawaHouse of Commons Canadahttp://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/Committee/411/HESA/Reports/RP5600467/hesarp08/hesarp08-e.pdf
2. TurcotteMInsights on Canadian society: Canadians with unmet home care needs20142019-10-20http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2014001/article/14042-eng.pdf
3. Health Council of CanadaSeniors in need, caregivers in distress: what are the home care priorities for seniors in Canada?2012032019-10-20http://www.carp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/HCC_HomeCare_2d.pdf
4. Expert Group on Home and Community CareBringing care home2015032019-10-20http://health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/ccac/docs/hcc_report.pdf