Available Assistive Technology Outcome Measures: Systematic Review

Author:

Borgnis FrancescaORCID,Desideri LorenzoORCID,Converti Rosa MariaORCID,Salatino ClaudiaORCID

Abstract

Background The World Health Organization claimed that measuring outcomes is necessary to understand the benefits of assistive technology (AT) and create evidence-based policies and systems to ensure universal access to it. In clinical practice, there is an increasing need for standardized methods to track AT interventions using outcome assessments. Objective This review provides an overview of the available outcome measures that can be used at the follow-up stage of any AT intervention and integrated into daily clinical or service practice. Methods We systematically searched for original manuscripts regarding available and used AT outcome measures by searching for titles and abstracts in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to March 2023. Results We analyzed 955 articles, of which 50 (5.2%) were included in the review. Within these, 53 instruments have been mentioned and used to provide an AT outcome assessment. The most widely used tool is the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology, followed by the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Technology Scale. Moreover, the identified measures addressed 8 AT outcome domains: functional efficacy, satisfaction, psychosocial impact, caregiver burden, quality of life, participation, confidence, and usability. The AT category Assistive products for activities and participation relating to personal mobility and transportation was the most involved in the reviewed articles. Conclusions Among the 53 cited instruments, only 17 (32%) scales were designed to evaluate specifically assistive devices. Moreover, 64% (34/53) of the instruments were only mentioned once to denote poor uniformity and concordance in the instruments to be used, limiting the possibility of comparing the results of studies. This work could represent a good guide for promoting the use of validated AT outcome measures in clinical practice that can be helpful to AT assessment teams in their everyday activities and the improvement of clinical practice.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference101 articles.

1. Global report on assistive technologyWorld Health Organization202205152023-04-13https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049451

2. LaytonNBorgJGlobal perspectives on assistive technologyProceedings of the GReAT Consultation 20192019GReAT Consultation 2019August 22-23, 2019Geneva, Switzerland

3. Global priority research agenda for improving access to high-quality affordable assistive technologyWorld Health Organization20172023-04-13https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/254660/WHO-EMP-IAU-2017.02-eng.pdf?sequence=1

4. Prevalence of coverage of assistive technology in the European Region: a scoping reviewWorld Health Organization20212023-04-13https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/344520?&locale-attribute=es

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3