Abstract
BackgroundInjury care involves the complex interaction of patient, physician, and environment that impacts patient complications, level of harm, and failure to rescue (FTR). FTR represents the likelihood of a hospital to be unable to rescue patients from death after in-hospital complications.ObjectiveThis study aimed to hypothesize that error type and number of errors contribute to increased level of harm and FTR.MethodsPatient information was abstracted from weekly trauma performance improvement (PI) records (from January 1, 2016, to July 19, 2017), where trauma surgeons determined the level of harm and identified the factors associated with complications. Level of harm was determined by definitions set forth by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Logistic regression was used to determine the impact of individual factors on FTR and level of harm, controlling for age, gender, Charlson score, injury severity score (ISS), error (in diagnosis, technique, or judgment), delay (in diagnosis or intervention), and need for surgery.ResultsA total of 2216 trauma patients presented during the study period. Of 2216 patients, 224 (224/2216, 10.10 %) had complications reported at PI meetings; of these, 31 patients (31/224, 13.8 %) had FTR. PI patients were more likely to be older (mean age 51.3 years, SE 1.58, vs 46.5 years, SE 0.51; P=.008) and have higher ISS (median 22 vs 8; P<.001), compared with patients without complications. Physician-attributable errors (odds ratio [OR] 2.82; P=.001), most commonly errors in technique, and nature of injury (OR 1.91; P=.01) were associated with higher levels of harm, whereas delays in diagnosis or intervention were not. Each additional factor involved increased level of harm (OR 2.09; P<.001) and nearly doubled likelihood of FTR (OR 1.95; P=.01).ConclusionsPhysician-attributable errors in diagnosis, technique, or judgment are more strongly correlated with harm than delays in diagnosis and intervention. Increasing number of errors identified in patient care correlates with an increasing level of harm and FTR.
Subject
Health Informatics,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference25 articles.
1. HoppesMMitchellJPavkovicSVendittiESheppardFHilliardMMunierWASHRM: American Society for Health Care Risk Management20142019-09-13Serious Safety Events: A Focus on Harm Classification: Deviation in Care as Link Getting to Zerohttps://www.ashrm.org/sites/default/files/ashrm/SSE-2_getting_to_zero-9-30-14.pdf
2. Classification of Surgical Complications
3. World Health Organization20092019-09-13Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safetyhttp://www.who.int/patientsafety/taxonomy/icps_full_report.pdf
4. Patient Safety Organizations Program | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality2019-03-15Common Formats: Overviewhttps://www.pso.ahrq.gov/common
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献