Hospital-Based Contact Tracing of Patients With COVID-19 and Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Eastern India: Cross-sectional Study

Author:

Sahoo Durgesh PrasadORCID,Singh Arvind KumarORCID,Sahu Dinesh PrasadORCID,Pradhan Somen KumarORCID,Patro Binod KumarORCID,Batmanabane GitanjaliORCID,Mishra BaijayantimalaORCID,Behera BijayiniORCID,Das AmbarishORCID,Dora G SusmitaORCID,Anand LORCID,Azhar S MORCID,Nair JyolsnaORCID,Panigrahi SasmitaORCID,Akshaya RORCID,Sahoo Bimal KumarORCID,Sahu SubhakantaORCID,Sahoo SuchismitaORCID

Abstract

Background The contact tracing and subsequent quarantining of health care workers (HCWs) are essential to minimizing the further transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection and mitigating the shortage of HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic situation. Objective This study aimed to assess the yield of contact tracing for COVID-19 cases and the risk stratification of HCWs who are exposed to these cases. Methods This was an analysis of routine data that were collected for the contact tracing of COVID-19 cases at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, in Odisha, India. Data from March 19 to August 31, 2020, were considered for this study. COVID-19 cases were admitted patients, outpatients, or HCWs in the hospital. HCWs who were exposed to COVID-19 cases were categorized, per the risk stratification guidelines, as high-risk contacts or low-risk contacts Results During contact tracing, 3411 HCWs were identified as those who were exposed to 360 COVID-19 cases. Of these 360 cases, 269 (74.7%) were either admitted patients or outpatients, and 91 (25.3%) were HCWs. After the risk stratification of the 3411 HCWs, 890 (26.1%) were categorized as high-risk contacts, and 2521 (73.9%) were categorized as low-risk contacts. The COVID-19 test positivity rates of high-risk contacts and low-risk contacts were 3.8% (34/890) and 1.9% (48/2521), respectively. The average number of high-risk contacts was significantly higher when the COVID-19 case was an admitted patient (number of contacts: mean 6.6) rather than when the COVID-19 case was an HCW (number of contacts: mean 4.0) or outpatient (number of contacts: mean 0.2; P=.009). Similarly, the average number of high-risk contacts was higher when the COVID-19 case was admitted in a non–COVID-19 area (number of contacts: mean 15.8) rather than when such cases were admitted in a COVID-19 area (number of contacts: mean 0.27; P<.001). There was a significant decline in the mean number of high-risk contacts over the study period (P=.003). Conclusions Contact tracing and risk stratification were effective and helped to reduce the number of HCWs requiring quarantine. There was also a decline in the number of high-risk contacts during the study period. This indicates the role of the implementation of hospital-based, COVID-19–related infection control strategies. The contact tracing and risk stratification approaches that were designed in this study can also be implemented in other health care settings.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference29 articles.

1. WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboardWorld Health Organization2021-08-21https://covid19.who.int/

2. #IndiaFightsCorona COVID-19 in India, vaccination, dashboard, corona virus trackerGovernment of India2021-08-12https://www.mygov.in/covid-19

3. Keep health workers safe to keep patients safe: WHOWorld Health Organization202009172021-01-12https://www.who.int/news/item/17-09-2020-keep-health-workers-safe-to-keep-patients-safe-who

4. Contact tracing in the context of COVID-19World Health Oranization202102012021-10-06https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/contact-tracing-in-the-context-of-covid-19

5. Risk assessment and management of exposure of health care workers in the context of COVID-19: Interim guidance, 19 March 2020World Health Organization202003192021-10-06https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331496/WHO-2019-nCov-HCW_risk_assessment-2020.2-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3