Abstract
Background
Executive function, including prospective memory, initiating, planning, and sequencing everyday activities, is frequently affected by acquired brain injury (ABI). Executive dysfunction necessitates the use of compensatory cognitive strategies and, in more severe cases, human support over time. To compensate for the executive dysfunction experienced, growing options for electronic mainstream and assistive technologies may be used by people with ABI and their supporters.
Objective
We outline the study protocol for a series of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) to evaluate the effectiveness of smart home, mobile, and/or wearable technologies in reducing executive function difficulties following ABI.
Methods
Up to 10 adults with ABI who experience executive dysfunction and have sufficient cognitive capacity to provide informed consent will be recruited across Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. Other key inclusion criteria are that they have substantial support needs for everyday living and reside in community dwellings. On the basis of the participant’s identified goal(s) and target behavior(s), a specific electronic assistive technology will be selected for application. Both identification of the target behavior(s) and selection of the assistive technology will be determined via consultation with each participant (and their key support person, if applicable). The choice of SCED will be individualized for each participant based on the type of technology used in the intervention, the difficulty level of the behavior targeted for change, and the anticipated rate of change. For each SCED, repeated measurements of the target behavior(s) during the baseline condition will provide performance data for comparison with the performance data collected during the intervention condition (with technology introduced). Secondary outcome measures will evaluate the impact of the intervention. The protocol includes 2 customizable Microsoft Excel spreadsheets for electronic record keeping.
Results
Recruitment period is June 2022 through March 2024. Trial results for the individual participants will be graphed and analyzed separately using structured visual analysis supplemented with statistical analysis. Analysis will focus on important features of the data, including both within- and between-phase comparisons for response level, trend, variability, immediacy, consistency, and overlap. An exploratory economic evaluation will determine the impact on formal and informal support usage, together with quality of life, following the implementation of the new technological intervention.
Conclusions
The study has been designed to test the cause-effect functional relationships between the intervention—in this case, electronic assistive technology—and its effect in changing the target behavior(s). The evaluation evidence gained will offer new insights into the application of various electronic assistive technologies for people who experience executive dysfunction following ABI. Furthermore, the results will help increase the capacity of key stakeholders to harness the potential of technology to build independence and reduce the cost of care for this population.
Trial Registration
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12622000835741, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000835741.aspx
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)
DERR1-10.2196/48503
Reference53 articles.
1. Disability in Australia: acquired brain injury. Bulletin no. 55. Cat no. AUS 96Australian Institute of Health and Welfare20072023-04-24https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/1f719b27-6b93-434a-b0e6-997b4ead061a/bulletin55.pdf
2. SloanS(2017). Understanding Acquired Brain Injury and behaviour changeASSBI ResourcesRandwick, NSWhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Understanding+Acquired+Brain+Injury+and+behaviour+change&author=Sloan+S.&publication+year=2017
3. Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample
4. Changes in Care and Support Needs Following Community-Based Intervention for Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury
5. Association between cognitive performance and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal multilevel examination.