Abstract
BackgroundVoice-controlled smart speakers and displays have a unique but unproven potential for delivering eHealth interventions. Many laptop- and smartphone-based interventions have been shown to improve multiple outcomes, but voice-controlled platforms have not been tested in large-scale rigorous trials. Older adults with multiple chronic health conditions, who need tools to help with their daily management, may be especially good candidates for interventions on voice-controlled devices because these patients often have physical limitations, such as tremors or vision problems, that make the use of laptops and smartphones challenging.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess whether participants using an evidence-based intervention (ElderTree) on a smart display will experience decreased pain interference and improved quality of life and related measures in comparison with participants using ElderTree on a laptop and control participants who are given no device or access to ElderTree.MethodsA total of 291 adults aged ≥60 years with chronic pain and ≥3 additional chronic conditions will be recruited from primary care clinics and community organizations and randomized 1:1:1 to ElderTree access on a smart display along with their usual care, ElderTree access on a touch screen laptop along with usual care, or usual care alone. All patients will be followed for 8 months. The primary outcomes are differences between groups in measures of pain interference and psychosocial quality of life. The secondary outcomes are between-group differences in system use at 8 months, physical quality of life, pain intensity, hospital readmissions, communication with medical providers, health distress, well-being, loneliness, and irritability. We will also examine mediators and moderators of the effects of ElderTree on both platforms. At baseline, 4 months, and 8 months, patients will complete written surveys comprising validated scales selected for good psychometric properties with similar populations. ElderTree use data will be collected continuously in system logs. We will use linear mixed-effects models to evaluate outcomes over time, with treatment condition and time acting as between-participant factors. Separate analyses will be conducted for each outcome.ResultsRecruitment began in August 2021 and will run through April 2023. The intervention period will end in December 2023. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study with a large sample and long time frame to examine whether a voice-controlled smart device can perform as well as or better than a laptop in implementing a health intervention for older patients with multiple chronic health conditions. As patients with multiple conditions are such a large cohort, the implications for cost as well as patient well-being are significant. Making the best use of current and developing technologies is a critical part of this effort.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04798196; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04798196International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/37522
Reference83 articles.
1. The potential of placing a digital assistant in patients’ homes
2. Potential for placing voice-activated devices to improve patient care in general practices as well as patients’ homes
3. WeiJDinglerTGongEOldenburgBKostakosVProactive smart speakers for chronic disease management: challenges and opportunities2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems20202022-02-15http://www.speechinteraction.org/CHI2020/papers/Proactive%20Smart%20Speakers%20for%20Chronic%20Disease%20Management(2).pdf
4. Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants in Health Care: International Delphi Study
5. CapanFWhy Amazon device is a gift for healthcareMedMark Media20162022-01-30https://media.mmm-online.com/documents/188/january_2016_viewpoint_46793.pdf
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献