Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study

Author:

Greenwood Ronni MichelleORCID,Manning Rachel MORCID,O'Shaughnessy Branagh RORCID,Cross OisinORCID,Vargas-Moniz Maria JORCID,Auquier PascalORCID,Santinello MassimoORCID,Wolf Judith RORCID,Bokszczanin AnnaORCID,Bernad RobertoORCID,Källmén HåkanORCID,Spinnewijn FrederikORCID,Ornelas JoséORCID,

Abstract

Background Homeless services expend considerable resources to provide for service users’ most basic needs, such as food and shelter, but their track record for ending homelessness is disappointing. An alternative model, Housing First, reversed the order of services so that homeless individuals are offered immediate access to independent housing, with wraparound supports but no treatment or abstinence requirements. Although the evidence base for Housing First’s effectiveness in ending homelessness is robust, less is known about its effectiveness in promoting recovery. Objective The objective of this research is to compare rehabilitation- and recovery-related outcomes of homeless services users who are engaged in either Housing First or traditional staircase services in eight European countries: France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden. Methods A mixed methods, multi-site investigation of Housing First and traditional services will compare quantitative outcomes at two time points. Key rehabilitation outcomes include stable housing and psychiatric symptoms. Key growth outcomes include community integration and acquired capabilities. Semistructured interviews will be used to examine service users’ experiences of environmental constraints and affordances on acquired capabilities to identify features of homeless services that enhance service users’ capabilities sets. Multi-level modelling will be used to test for group differences—Housing First versus traditional services—on key outcome variables. Thematic analysis will be used to understand the ways in which service users make sense of internal and external affordances and constraints on capabilities. Results The study is registered with the European Commission (registration number: H2020-SC6-REVINEQUAL-2016/ GA726997). Two press releases, a research report to the funding body, two peer-reviewed articles, and an e-book chapter are planned for dissemination of the final results. The project was funded from September 2016 through September 2019. Expected results will be disseminated in 2019 and 2020. Conclusions We will use the findings from this research to formulate recommendations for European social policy on the configuration of homeless services and the scaling up and scaling out of Housing First programs. From our findings, we will draw conclusions about the setting features that promote individuals’ exits from homelessness, rehabilitation, and recovery. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/14584

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

General Medicine

Reference65 articles.

1. The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations

2. Victimization and traumatic injuries among the homeless: Associations with alcohol, drug, and mental problems.

3. Single Homelessness as Social Exclusion: The Unique and the Extreme

4. Busch-GeertsemaVHousing First Europe: Final Report20132019-12-04Brussels, BelgiumEuropean Union Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity (PROGRESS)http://housingfirstguide.eu/website/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/FinalReportHousingFirstEurope.pdf

5. Busch-GeertsemaVEuropean Journal of Homelessness. Volume 8, No. 12014082019-12-04Housing First Europe: Results of a European social experimentation project https://www.feantsaresearch.org/download/article-01_8-13977658399374625612.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3