Using Short-Form Videos to Get Clinical Trial Newcomers to Sign Up: Message-Testing Experiment

Author:

Hu SisiORCID,Kirkpatrick Ciera EORCID,Lee NamyeonORCID,Hong YoorimORCID,Lee SungkyoungORCID,Hinnant AmandaORCID

Abstract

Background Recruiting participants for clinical trials poses challenges. Major barriers to participation include psychological factors (eg, fear and mistrust) and logistical constraints (eg, transportation, cost, and scheduling). The strategic design of clinical trial messaging can help overcome these barriers. While strategic communication can be done through various channels (eg, recruitment advertisements), health care providers on the internet have been found to be key sources for communicating clinical trial information to US adults in the social media era. Objective This study aims to examine how communication source (ie, medical doctors and peers) and message framing of TikTok videos (ie, psychological and logistical framing) influence clinical trial–related attitudes, perceptions, and sign-up behaviors under the guidance of the integrated behavioral model. Methods This study used a 2 (source: doctor vs peer) × 2 (framing: psychological vs logistical) between-participant factorial design web-based experiment targeting adults in the United States who had never participated in clinical trials (ie, newcomers). A Qualtrics panel was used to recruit and compensate the study respondents (n=561). Participants viewed short-form videos with doctors or peers, using psychological or logistical framing. The main outcome measures included perceived source credibility, self-efficacy, attitude toward clinical trial participation, behavioral intention, and sign-up behavior. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the direct and indirect effects of message factors on the outcome variables. Source (doctor=1; peer=0) and framing (psychological=1; logistical=0) were dummy-coded. Results Doctor-featured messages led to greater perceived source credibility (β=.31, P<.001), leading to greater self-efficacy (95% CI 0.13-0.30), which in turn enhanced behavioral intention (95% CI 0.12-0.29) and clinical trial sign-up behavior (95% CI 0.02-0.04). Logistical barrier–framed messages led to greater self-efficacy (β=–.09, P=.02), resulting in higher intention to participate in clinical trials (95% CI –0.38 to –0.03) and improved sign-up behavior (95% CI –0.06 to –0.004). Logistical barrier–framed messages were also directly associated with an increased likelihood of signing up for a clinical trial (β=–.08, P=.03). The model accounted for 21% of the variance in clinical trial sign-up behavior. Attitude did not significantly affect behavioral intention in this study (β=.08, P=.14), and psychological and logistical barrier–framed messages did not significantly differ in attitudes toward clinical trial participation (β=–.04, P=.09). Conclusions These findings advance our understanding of how people process popular message characteristics in short-form videos and lend practical guidance for communicators. We encourage medical professionals to consider short-form video sites (eg, TikTok and Instagram Reels) as effective tools for discussing clinical trials and participation opportunities. Specifically, featuring doctors discussing efforts to reduce logistical barriers is recommended. Our measuring of actual behavior as an outcome is a rare and noteworthy contribution to this research.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Reference61 articles.

1. National Cancer InstituteClinical trial participation among US adultsHealth Information National Trends Survey HINTS Briefs20222023-05-27https://hints.cancer.gov/docs/Briefs/HINTS_Brief_48.pdf

2. Clinical trial diversityUS Food and Drug Administration2023-05-27https://www.fda.gov/consumers/minority-health-and-health-equity/clinical-trial-diversity

3. Increasing Diversity in Clinical Trials: Overcoming Critical Barriers

4. A Comparison Between Caucasians and African Americans in Willingness to Participate in Cancer Clinical Trials: The Roles of Knowledge, Distrust, Information Sources, and Religiosity

5. Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: Comparing Perceptions and Knowledge of African American and White South Carolinians

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3