The Report of Access and Engagement With Digital Health Interventions Among Children and Young People: Systematic Review

Author:

Whitehead LisaORCID,Robinson SuzanneORCID,Arabiat DianaORCID,Jenkins MarkORCID,Morelius EvalotteORCID

Abstract

Background Digital health interventions are increasingly used to deliver health-related interventions for children and young people to change health behaviors and improve health outcomes. Digital health interventions have the potential to enhance access to and engagement with children and young people; however, they may also increase the divide between those who can access technology and are supported to engage and those who are not. This review included studies that reported on the access to or engagement with digital health interventions among children and young people. Objective This review aims to identify and report on access and engagement in studies involving digital health interventions among children and young people. Methods A systematic review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methods for conducting systematic reviews was conducted. An electronic literature search was conducted for all studies published between January 1, 2010, and August 2022, across sources, including MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Studies were included if they examined any aspect of access or engagement in relation to interventions among children and young people. The quality of the included papers was assessed, and data were extracted. Data were considered for meta-analysis, where possible. Results A total of 3292 references were identified using search terms. Following the exclusion of duplicates and review by inclusion criteria, 40 studies were independently appraised for their methodological quality. A total of 16 studies were excluded owing to their low assessed quality and flawed critical elements in the study design. The studies focused on a variety of health conditions; type 1 diabetes, weight management and obesity, mental health issues, and sexual health were the predominant conditions. Most studies were conducted in developed countries, with most of them being conducted in the United States. Two studies reported data related to access and considered ethnicity and social determinants. No studies used strategies to enhance or increase access. All studies included in the review reported on at least 1 aspect of engagement. Engagement with interventions was measured in relation to frequency of engagement, with no reference to the concept of effective engagement. Conclusions Most digital health interventions do not consider the factors that can affect access and engagement. Of those studies that measured either access or engagement or both, few sought to implement strategies to improve access or engagement to address potential disparities between groups. Although the literature to date provides some insight into access and engagement and how these are addressed in digital health interventions, there are major limitations in understanding how both can be enhanced to promote equity. Consideration of both access and engagement is vital to ensure that children and young people have the ability to participate in studies. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42020170874; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=170874

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Health Informatics,Biomedical Engineering,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference61 articles.

1. World Health OrganisationWHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengtheningWorld Health Organization2019662023-12-18https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550505

2. OCEDDigital transformation in the age of COVID-19: building resilience and bridging divides, digital economy outlook 2020 supplementOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development20202023-12-18https://img.lalr.co/cms/2020/11/27173400/digital-economy-outlook-covid.pdf

3. ThomasJBarraketJParkinsonSWilsonCHolcombe-JamesIKennedyJMannellKBrydonAAustralian digital inclusion index: 2021RMIT, Swinburne University of Technology, and Telstra20212023-12-18https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/file/ab6218ee-55f3-4d84-9174-76ca9ec877be/1/2021-thomas-measuring_australias_digital.pdf

4. COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies

5. Mobility network models of COVID-19 explain inequities and inform reopening

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3