Recording of Social Determinants in Computerized Medical Records in Primary Care Consultations: Quasi-Experimental Study

Author:

Rodoreda-Pallàs BertaORCID,Lumillo-Gutiérrez IrisORCID,Miró Catalina QueraltORCID,Torra Escarrer EvaORCID,Sanahuja Juncadella JaumeORCID,Morin Fraile VictoriaORCID

Abstract

Background  Social determinants of health may be more important than medical or lifestyle choices in influencing people's health. Even so, there is a deficit in recording these in patients' computerized medical histories. The Spanish administration and the World Health Organization are promoting the recording of diagnoses in computerized clinical histories with the aim of benefiting the individual, the professional, and the community. In most cases, professionals tend to record only clinical diagnoses despite evidence in the literature documenting that addressing the social determinants of health can lead to improvements in health and reductions in social disparities in disease. Objective  This study aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a mixed intervention (face-to-face-digital) aimed at improving the quantity and quality of the records of the social determinants of health in computerized medical records at primary care clinics. Methods  A quasi-experimental, nonrandomized, controlled, multicenter study with 2 parallel study arms was conducted in the area of Central Catalonia (Spain) with primary care professionals of the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), working from September 23, 2019, to March 31, 2020. All interested professionals were accepted. In total, 22 basic health areas were involved in the study. In Spain and Catalonia, the International Classification of Diseases is used, in which there is a coding of the social determinants of health. Five social determinants were selected by a physician, a nurse, and a social worker; these professionals had experience in primary care and were experts in community health. The choice was made taking into account the ease of use, benefit, and existing terminology. The intervention, based on the integration of a checklist, was integrated as part of the usual multidisciplinary clinical workflow in primary care consultations to influence the recording of these determinants in the patient's computerized medical record. Results  After 6 months of implementing the intervention, the volume and quantity of records of 5 social determinants of health were compared, and a significant increase in the median number of pre- and postintervention diagnoses was observed (P≤.001). There was also an increase in the diversity of selected social determinants. Using the linear regression model, the significant mean increase of the experimental group with respect to the control group was estimated with a coefficient of 8.18 (95% CI 5.11-11.26). Conclusions  The intervention described in this study is an effective tool for coding the social determinants of health designed by a multidisciplinary team to be incorporated into the workflow of primary care practices. The effectiveness of its usability and the description of the intervention described here should be generalizable to any environment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04151056; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04151056

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Health Informatics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference43 articles.

1. Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS)Determinantes sociales de la saludWorld Health Organization2022-12-21https://www.paho.org/es/temas/determinantes-sociales-salud

2. Guia de Acción Comunitaria a para ganarSpanish Ministry of Health, Ministerio de Sanidad, Dirección General de Salud Pública. Subdirección General de Promoción, Prevención y Calidad20212022-12-23https://www.sanidad.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/prevPromocion/Estrategia/docs/Guia_Accion_Comunitaria_Ganar_Salud.pdf

3. SolarOIrwinAA conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of healthWorld Heaith Organization20102022-12-21https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241500852

4. The Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows

5. Challenging Inequities in Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3