Importance of Patient History in Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Medical Diagnosis: Comparison Study

Author:

Fukuzawa FumitoshiORCID,Yanagita YasutakaORCID,Yokokawa DaikiORCID,Uchida ShunORCID,Yamashita ShihoORCID,Li YuORCID,Shikino KiyoshiORCID,Tsukamoto TomokoORCID,Noda KazutakaORCID,Uehara TakanoriORCID,Ikusaka MasatomiORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Medical history contributes approximately 80% to a diagnosis, although physical examinations and laboratory investigations increase a physician’s confidence in the medical diagnosis. The concept of artificial intelligence (AI) was first proposed more than 70 years ago. Recently, its role in various fields of medicine has grown remarkably. However, no studies have evaluated the importance of patient history in AI-assisted medical diagnosis. Objective This study explored the contribution of patient history to AI-assisted medical diagnoses and assessed the accuracy of ChatGPT in reaching a clinical diagnosis based on the medical history provided. Methods Using clinical vignettes of 30 cases identified in The BMJ, we evaluated the accuracy of diagnoses generated by ChatGPT. We compared the diagnoses made by ChatGPT based solely on medical history with the correct diagnoses. We also compared the diagnoses made by ChatGPT after incorporating additional physical examination findings and laboratory data alongside history with the correct diagnoses. Results ChatGPT accurately diagnosed 76.6% (23/30) of the cases with only the medical history, consistent with previous research targeting physicians. We also found that this rate was 93.3% (28/30) when additional information was included. Conclusions Although adding additional information improves diagnostic accuracy, patient history remains a significant factor in AI-assisted medical diagnosis. Thus, when using AI in medical diagnosis, it is crucial to include pertinent and correct patient histories for an accurate diagnosis. Our findings emphasize the continued significance of patient history in clinical diagnoses in this age and highlight the need for its integration into AI-assisted medical diagnosis systems.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Reference34 articles.

1. The diagnostic performance feedback “calibration gap”: why clinical experience alone is not enough to prevent serious diagnostic errors;Omron;AEM Educ Train

2. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health CareBoard on Health Care ServicesInstitute of MedicineThe National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Balogh EP Miller BT Ball JR , editors. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies Press; 2015. ISBN: 9780309377720

3. Cause of death and significant disease found at autopsy;Friberg;Virchows Arch

4. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review;Shojania;JAMA

5. The diagnostic usefulness of the history of the patient with dyspnea;Schmitt;J Gen Intern Med

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3