Abstract
Background
Chronic pain is a highly prevalent condition that requires multidisciplinary treatment. However, in the United Kingdom, access to specialist pain clinics where patients can receive medical multidisciplinary treatment is limited, and provision varies between health boards. As such, self-management of chronic pain using digital tools has been gaining traction recently, but evidence of its effectiveness from clinical-based trials focuses mainly on quantitative outcomes.
Objective
This systematic review aims to identify, appraise, and synthesize qualitative evidence on patients’ experiences with digital health interventions (DHIs) for the management of chronic pain.
Methods
This systematic review will consider qualitative and mixed methods studies that explore the experience of patients (aged 18 years and older) with chronic pain engaging in DHIs to manage their pain. MEDLINE Ovid, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases will be searched for published studies. The systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the ENTREQ (Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research) guidelines. Following the 3-step thematic synthesis methodology of Thomas and Harden, titles and abstracts will be screened by 2 independent reviewers (AM and HM), and a third reviewer (MI or FM) will resolve any conflict that arises before the full-text screening. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist tool will be used to critically appraise the included studies. The extracted data will be imported to NVivo (QSR International), where thematic synthesis will be used to derive analytical themes from the included studies.
Results
Themes that encapsulate the patient experience will be identified from qualitative evidence, and these themes will shed light on the perceived benefits and disadvantages, usability, acceptability, and the overall impact digital tools can have on the lives of those with chronic pain.
Conclusions
This systematic review will identify, appraise, and synthesize the overall experience of patients engaging in DHI to manage a diverse range of chronic pain conditions. By elaborating the patient experience through qualitative analysis, the findings from this review will enhance our current understanding of the experiences of patients with chronic pain using digital tools for the self-management of their pain and highlight what person-centered elements are essential for future DHI development.
Trial Registration
PROSPERO CRD42023445100; http://tinyurl.com/4z77khfs
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)
DERR1-10.2196/52469
Reference41 articles.
1. Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances
2. ICD-11: International Classification of Diseases (11th revision)World Health Organization2023-06-16https://icd.who.int/
3. Chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16s: assessment of all chronic pain and management of chronic primary painNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence20212023-06-20https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng193
4. The prevalence of chronic pain and its associated factors among Saudi Al-Kharj population; a cross sectional study
5. Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies