Abstract
The study focused on the operational efficiency of e-trikes and motorized tricycles as public utility vehicles, leading to the analytical comparison of the data gathered. The comparative analysis on both tricycles reveals that e-trikes are more efficient and safer, consume zero fuel, and almost double in passenger capacity when compared to the motorized tricycle. Further, e-trike can enter narrower streets or alley easily for having lesser width. On the other hand, motorized tricycles are faster and can reach higher kilometrage and with a shorter length, it has no problems on approaching slopes and bumps. M/M/1 was used to evaluate the service performance of the electrical and motorized tricycles in the terminal. The results show that the e-trike terminal service rate is more efficient than that of the motorized terminal where commuters spent lesser time waiting to be served. The study recommends the need to understand further the effects, advantages, and disadvantages of both tricycles as regard the planned implementation in the mode of public transportation system. Additionally, further study may be needed focusing on the economic and environmental sustainability, and the use of renewable resources to contribute on the sustainable development and increase operational efficiency of PUVs.
Publisher
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Engineering and Sciences Publication - BEIESP
Subject
Computer Science Applications,General Engineering,Environmental Engineering
Reference36 articles.
1. M.D.V. Gullen, H. Ishida, N. Okamoto, and M. Tsutsumi, Public Transport Policies and the Road-based Public Transport Service in Developing Countries: The Case of Indigenous Public Transport Modes in Davao City, Philippines, 7th International Conference of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Tsukuba (2007) 18.
2. D.N. Declan, An Empirical Study of the Use of Tricycle as a Public Transport Mode in Nigerian Cities, Journal of Social Sciences and Public Affairs. 2(2) (2012) 66-76.
3. World Heritage Encyclopedia, Auto Rickshaw. (2004).
4. F.E. Balaria, A.F. Ortiz, A.G. Gabriel, M.P. Pascual, M.D. Santos, and T.S. Mangahas, Sustainability of E-Trike as Alternative Mode, Open Journal of Civil Engineering. 7 (2017) 362 - 377. [CrossRef]
5. A. Morita, K. Takeuchi, K. Doi, R.G. Sigua, K. Honda, F. Seta, and A. Murakami, Urban Transport and Local Governance in Asian developing Countries - In Search of Transportation Policies, IATSS Research. 28(1) (2004) 6 - 18. [CrossRef]
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献