Affiliation:
1. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Tula Branch
2. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Abstract
Purpose: of the article is to develop a model of the value system of Russian youth, which can form the basis for the formation of the orientations of young people necessary for the state, contributing to the sustainable development of the Russian Federation. Methods: the article used both traditional methods of scientifi c analysis and methods of Bayesian intelligent measurement methodology used in conditions of uncertainty, inaccuracy and incompleteness of data characteristic of social and socio-economic systems. Results: in the presented study, the extensible hierarchical information model of the value system of Russian youth has been developed. The methodology for processing questionnaire data has been developed, the results of which are presented on numerical and linguistic scales, which makes it possible to take into account the uncertainty of the information received. According to the results of the survey of university students of 10 subjects of the Russian Federation aged 17 to 30 years, a total of 1816 people obtained the values of factors characterizing the value world of Russian youth, which allowed her to form her portrait. Some value factors of young people of the Tula region are evaluated and analyzed. Conclusions and Relevance: the proposed model and methodology for processing personal data allows us to create the adequate holistic portrait of Russian youth in modern economic conditions. The formation of two groups of young people characterized by unfavorable and favorable value attitudes towards Russian society has been revealed, which in the future may lead to a confl ict of social and economic interests, thereby negatively aff ecting the pace of economic growth and sustainable development of the state. In order to reduce internal tension between youth groups and the formation of values inherent in Russian society, measures at the federal and regional levels are proposed.
Reference26 articles.
1. Braithwaite V.A., Scott W.A. Values. In: Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Eds. Robinson J.P., Shaver P.R., Wrightsman L.S. New York: Academic Press, 1991. Р. 661–753. URL: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c05f8595cfd7901fc57139d/t/5c872191971a182c900397ab/1552359855102/vb_wc_91_values.pdf (accessed: 09. 09. 2023) (In Eng.)
2. Gogiberidze G.M., Skrynnik M.A. Patriotism as a target guideline for the interaction of Social institutions of education and culture: axiological aspect. MCU Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2022; 1(41):33–46. https://elibrary.ru/jnogjm. doi: 10.25688/2078-9238.2022.41.1.03 (In Russ.)
3. Mikeshina L.A. The problem of values in modern sociology: an epistemological analysis. Sociological Studies. 2020; (12):44–53. https://elibrary.ru/zfjeau. doi: 10.31857/S013216250011917-1 (In Russ.)
4. Volobuev Ya.V. The factors of unification of values in the modern world. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy. 2022; (4):56–86. https://elibrary.ru/ufbqsa (In Russ.)
5. Esmer Y. Globalization, «McDonaldization» and values: Quo vadis? Comparative Sociology. 2006; 5(2-3):183–202. doi: 10.1163/156913306778667393 (In Eng.)