Author:
TABAK Pinar, ,BÜYÜKAKINCI Banu Yeşim,
Abstract
Restoration interventions aims at conserving heritage structures. Different situations may occur during restoration works comparing to standard construction works. These differences may cause special risks for workers and the structure itself. Risk analysis is widely used in restoration field in the world as a work plan routine. Definite division between restoration and standard works hasn’t been defined in Turkey. Aim of the study is revealing what kind of different risks restoration works carry, creating awareness and making recommendations for avoiding these risks. As method of this study, Fine Kinney Method was chosen. The risk factor was obtained by using probability, severity and frequency values. Listed masonry houses from Fatih district were chosen. The region is composed of civil architectural examples more densely comparing to whole Istanbul. The most important criteria is the fact that these houses are among the oldest masonry examples in Istanbul. They carry more risks with their current deterioration levels. The possible risks were listed and documented. The results were presented using Fine Kinney Method. Falling from height and partial collapse are found as main risks in restoration works. Risk levels and risk types of potential risks in restoration works show differences than the standard construction applications.
Publisher
Universitatea Gheorghe Asachi din Iasi
Reference25 articles.
1. "* * *, Resmi gazete, 6331 sayılı İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Kanunu, 2012, https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.6331.pdf.
2. [2] X. Romao, E. Pauperio, N. Pereira, A framework for the simplified risk analysis of cultural heritage assets, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 20, 2016, pp. 696-708. Special Issue SI. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2016.05.007.
3. [3] E. Gürcanlı, İnşaat sektöründe gerçekleşen ölüm ve yaralanmaların analizi, Türk Tabipleri birliği mesleki sağlık ve güvenlik dergisi, Nisan-mayıs-haziran, 2013, pp. 20-29.
4. [4] J. Reyers, J. Mansfield, The Assessment of Risk in Conservation Refurbishment Projects, Structural Survey, 19(5), 2001, pp. 238-244.
5. [5] B. Birgören, Fine Kinney risk analizi yönteminde risk analizi yönteminde risk faktörlerinin hesaplama zorlukları ve çözüm önerileri, Uluslararası Mühendisliği Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi, 9, 2017, pp. 19-25.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献