Abstract
Objectives: A comparative study between band ligation technique and conventional hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of Grade III hemorrhoids was carried out to compare operative and post-operative variables.
Methods: This study was done on a sample size of 70 patients with Grade III hemorrhoids from 2019 to 2020 in the department of surgery of a medical college. Informed written consent was taken from the patients after explaining the benefits and side effects of both methods. The eligible patients were randomly divided into Group A (35 patients) for treatment by band ligation procedure and Group B (35 patients) who were treated by the conventional technique. The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis by applying an unpaired t-test using SPSS 19.0 software.
Results: The difference between the two groups of the average age was comparable. The operative time and intraoperative bleeding were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B. The time to first bowel movement (hr) and average hospital stay were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B. Furthermore, the average number of analgesic doses required was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B. Furthermore, the time required for wound healing was significantly lower in Group A. The overall complications were found to be quite less in Group A than in Group B.
Conclusion: The rubber band ligation technique revealed better results in terms of operative and post-operative parameters as compared to the conventional hemorrhoidectomy.
Publisher
Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology
Reference16 articles.
1. Hardy A, Chan CL, Cohen CR. The surgical management of hemorrhoids-a review. Dig Surg 2005;22:26-33. doi: 10.1159/000085343, PMID 15838168
2. Phillips RK, Hollingshead JR. Hemorrhoids: Current diagnosis and treatment. Postgrad Med J 2016;92:4-8.
3. Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJ, Biggs K, Shephard N, Wailoo AJ, et al. Hemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree hemorrhoids (Hubble): A multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2016;388:356-64.
4. Lohsiriwat V. Treatment of hemorrhoids: A coloproctologist’s view. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:9245-52. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9245, PMID 26309351
5. Lu LY, Zhu Y, Sun Q. A retrospective analysis of short and long term efficacies of RBL for hemorrhoids. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17:2827-30. PMID 24174368