Author:
KALLURI SAIPRIYANKA ,NAGAJYOTHI J
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of clonidine with dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to bupivacaine in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block.
Methods: This was a prospective comparative study conducted in the department of anesthesiology of a tertiary care medical institute. 80 patients undergoing various upper-limb surgeries were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of whether they received Clonidine (Group C) or Dexmedetomidine (Group D) as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine for supraclavicular block. The onset as well as duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration of analgesia, quality of anesthesia, hemodynamics, and adverse effects were compared between the two groups. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The gender distribution of cases in Group C and Group D was found to be comparable, with no statistically significant difference. The mean age of patients in both groups was found to be comparable with no significant difference (p=0.5671). The most common types of surgeries in the studied cases were those of the lower radius and ulna (28.75%), followed by the lower humerus (21.25%), upper radius, and ulna (20%). The mean duration of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia were found to be higher in group D as compared to group C, and the difference was found to be statistically highly significant (p<0.0001). The quality of anesthesia was better in patients who received dexmedetomidine as compared to those who received clonidine with Bupivacaine.
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine used as an adjuvant with bupivacaine for brachial plexus block is associated with prolonged duration of sensory as well as motor block and duration of analgesia as compared to when clonidine is used as an adjuvant. It is also associated with a better quality of anesthesia.
Publisher
Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd
Reference20 articles.
1. Neal JM, Gerancher JC, Hebl JR, Ilfeld BM, McCartney CJ, Franco CD, et al. Upper extremity regional anaesthesia: Essentials of our current understanding, 2008 [published correction appears in Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):407]. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009;34:134-70. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819624eb
2. D’Souza RS, Johnson RL. Supraclavicular block. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
3. Omoregbe OR, Idehen HO, Imarengiaye CO. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb fracture fixation: A comparison of nerve stimulation, ultrasound-guided technique and a combination of both techniques. West Afr J Med 2020;37:757-62.
4. Kapral S, Krafft P, Eibenberger K, Fitzgerald R, Gosch M, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anaesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 1994;78:507-13. doi:10.1213/00000539-199403000-00016
5. Aksu R, Bicer C. Addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Clin Invest Med 2017;40:E111-6. doi:10.25011/cim.v40i3.28390