4. Haiǁom resettlement, legal action and political representation

Author:

Dieckmann Ute1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Cologne

Abstract

This chapter considers the destiny of indigenous Haiǁom after they were evicted from Etosha National Park in the 1950s. Differently to communities further west, Haiǁom were not provided a “Homeland” under the separate development policies of the 1970s, but instead were left without any land. In post-independent Namibia this meant they had no opportunity to establish conservancies under Namibia’s Community-Based Natural Resources Management programme. Some efforts have been made to compensate Haiǁom by purchasing several farms for them in the vicinity of the Etosha National Park, although most Haiǁom residents of the park resisted their resettlement, fearing they would lose all access to the park, i.e. their ancestral land. In 2015, a large group of Haiǁom from various areas dissatisfied with the government’s resettlement approach, launched a legal claim to parts of their ancestral land, mainly within Etosha National Park. This chapter outlines these developments, paying attention to the rather ambivalent role played by the Haiǁom Traditional Authority. It also looks at recent developments, arguing for inclusion of Haiǁom cultural heritage in future planning and implementation of nature conservation and tourism activities in the Etosha area.

Publisher

Open Book Publishers

Reference65 articles.

1. NAN SWAA A 267/11/1 1956: Report of the Commission for the Preservation of Bushmen in South West Africa.

2. Amupadhi, T. 2004. New Haiǁom Traditional Authority eyes Etosha. The Namibian 29.7.2004, https://www.namibian.com.na/new-hai-om-traditional-authority-eyes-etosha/

3. E.H.A. [Etosha Haiǁom Association] Committee 2011. Letter E.H.A. to Minister of Environment and Tourism, Honorable Minister Mrs. Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah, cc’d to Ministry of Lands and Resettlement, Millennium Challenge Account, Namibia Wildlife Resorts, Haiǁom Traditional Authority, Office of the Prime Minister, San Development Programme, The Legal Assistance Centre.

4. High Court of Namibia 2019. Tsumib and Others versus Government of the Republic of Namibia and Others (A206/2015[2019]) NAHCMD 312 (28.8.2019) (Tsumib).

5. Jan Tsumib and 8 others v Government of the Republic of Namibia and 19 others, Case Number A206/2015.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3