2. De Morgan and Logic

Author:

Heinemann Anna-Sophie

Abstract

From 1847 onwards, Augustus De Morgan propounded an extension of classical syllogistic logic by the introduction of ‘contraries’. These are negative terms in the sense that, for example, x means non-x within a given ‘universe’. In this chapter, we will focus on De Morgan’s early research on logic between 1847 and 1850, and address De Morgan’s revisions of traditional syllogistic logic in his ‘system of contraries’ and his ‘numerically definite system’. We will discuss his approach to determining portions of ‘universes’, which is based on determining extensions by numbers of instances of terms. The main point will be that De Morgan conceived of logical quantities as scopes and of conjunctive or disjunctive enumeration as quantifications over given domains—which is one of the systematic reasons behind his being involved in a long-lasting debate over the ‘quantification of the predicate’. It will be argued that, despite its relative lack of influence on later developments, De Morgan’s work still represented a notable departure from traditional syllogistic methods and anticipated the modern understanding of quantification in logic.

Publisher

Open Book Publishers

Reference589 articles.

1. Aldrich, Henry, Artis Logicae Rudimenta from the Text of Aldrich. With Illustrative Observations on Each Section, 2nd edn (Oxford: Baxter, 1821).

2. Allard, James W., ‘Early Nineteenth-Century Logic’, in The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, ed. by W. J. Mander (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199594474.013.001

3. A History of Quantification;Bonevac, Daniel,2012

4. Boole, George, ‘On Propositions Numerically Definite. By the late George Boole, F.R.S., Professor of Mathematics in Queen’s College. Communicated by A. De Morgan, Esq.’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 11 (1871), 396–411.

5. Broun, James, ‘The Supreme Logical Formule [sic]’, The Athenæum, 1025, 19 June 1847, 645–46.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3